Site Home Linking  Message Boards  Help Automated Genealogy Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB
1901 Census of Canada Page Information
District:BC YALE & CARIBOO (#5)
Subdistrict:Yale (West/Ouest) L-7 Page 1
Image: View the image with: split screen
Images are from National Archives Web Site
Details:Schedule 1 Microfilm T-6431
Transcriber:  K. Keeley
Proof reader:Ghislaine Joiner

Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
flag icon indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L
i
n
e
 
#
Numbered in order of visitation Personal Description Links
H
o
u
s
e
Family
or
House-
hold
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. Sex. C
o
l
o
u
r
Relationship
to head of
family or
household.
Single,
married,
widowed or
divorced.
Month and date of birth. Year of birth. Age at last birthday.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
flag1   1 Maxwell William M   Lodger with no. 3 S Sep 1 1879
22 page icon
 
flag2   1 Brewster James Howard M   Lodger with no. 3 S Mar 6 1878
23 page icon
 
3   1 Clemes Art M   Head M Nov 13 1851
49 page icon
 
4   1 Clemes Esther F   Wife M Oct 8 1851
49 page icon
 
5   1 Oppenheim Helen F   Domestic S Jul 22 1881
19 page icon
 
flag6   1 Oppenheim Rachel F   Domestic S May 17 1874
26 page icon
 
7   1 Clemes Henry M   Brother & Lodger W  not known  
40 page icon
 
8   1 Inskip Forrester Cecil M   Lodger & Employee S Feb 3 1877
24 page icon
 
9   1 Nylander Hans M   Lodger & Employee S May 19 1853
47 page icon
 
10   1 Clark Walter M   Lodger & Employee M Apr 9 1867
33 page icon
 
11   1 Donnelly James M   Employee S Jun 3 1858
42 page icon
 
12   1 Clapperton Sandy M     M  not known 1869
32 page icon
 
13   2 Inskip Percy Charles M     S Jun 4 1874
26 page icon
 
flag14   3 Negrean(?) John M   Head M Jun 13  
41 page icon
 
15   3 Negrean(?) Clara F   Wife M May 3  
25 page icon
 
16   3 Negrean(?) John M   Son S Dec 10  
9 page icon
 
17   3 Negrean(?) Clara F   Daughter S Mar 18 1894
7 page icon
 
18   3 Negrean(?) Matilda F   Daughter S Nov 21 1896
4 page icon
 
19   3 Negrean(?) Robert M   Son S Feb 23 1899
2 page icon
 
20   4 Ghlighemken(?) John M     M  not known abt.
47 page icon
 
21   5 Hans William M     M  not known 1864
36 page icon
 
flag22   6 Gaudern Wm M     S Feb 23 1877
24 page icon
 
flag23   7 Smith John M   Head M Aug 17 1852
48 page icon
 
24   7 Smith Jessie Ann F   Wife M Jul 17 1853
47 page icon
01
25   7 Smith Jessie A. F   Daughter S Jan 22 1885
16 page icon
 
26   7 Smith John Wm M   Son S Oct 13 1886
14 page icon
 
27   7 Smith Isabella F   Daughter S Mar 10 1889
12 page icon
 
28   7 Smith Jemima F   Daughter S Apr 23 1891
9 page icon
 
29   7 Smith Frank M   Son S Jul 16 1893
7 page icon
 
30   7 Smith Margaret C. F   Daughter S Sep 13 1895
5 page icon
 
31   7 Smith Alice J. F   Daughter S Aug 2 1898
2 page icon
 
32   7 Smith William M   Brother & Employee S Aug 17 1850
50 page icon
 
flag33   8 MacKay Jane F   Sister in Law W Apr 29 185?
44 page icon
 
flag34   8 MacKay Mary F   daughter of no. 10 S Jul 14 1890
10 page icon
 
flag35   8 MacKay Jemima F   daughter of no. 10 S Jul 6 1892
8 page icon
 
flag36   8 MacKay Malcolm M   son of no. 10 S May 26 1895
5 page icon
 
flag37   8 Fleming Robert W. M   Lodger & Employee of no. 9 S Nov 17 1880
20 page icon
01
flag38   8 Nselkapesket(?) Thomas M   Lodger & Employee of no. 9 S  not known abt.
22 page icon
 
flag39   8 Nltekatem(?) Wal? M   Lodger & Employee of no. 9 S  not known abt.
19 page icon
 
flag40   8 Lee Mong (Jack) M   Lodger & Employee of no. 9 S  not known abt.
60 page icon
 
flag41   9 Tom Seng (Charles) M   Head S Aug    
61 page icon
 
42   9 Ching Oen M   Employee of ??? M May    
34 page icon
 
43   9 Chong Eeng Ho M   Lodger M Nov    
38 page icon
 
flag44   9 Ah Joe M   Employee of no. 11 S May    
23 page icon
 
45   10 Mak A Loy M     S  not known about
40 page icon
 
46   10 Chang Foy M     S  not known about
45 page icon
 
47   10 Ma Sek Kon M     S  uncertain about
45 page icon
 
48   10 Loh(?) Hang M     S  uncertain about
55 page icon
 
flag49   10 Vi???a Robert M   Nephew of lines 5 & 6(?) S Jun 15 1898
3 page icon
 
flag50   10 Vicoena(?) Ruby F   Niece of line 5 & 6 & 1(?) S Mar 9 1899
2 page icon
 

Line Notes On This Page

* The following note applies to line 6:
'Rachel is the mother of Ruby on line 50'

* The following note applies to line 23:
'family no. 9 (crossed out)'

* The following note applies to line 33:
'no. 10 was entered in "family" field, but was crossed out'

* The following note applies to line 34:
'daughter of no. 10 probably refers to Jane MacKay (family no.10, crossed out)'

* The following note applies to line 35:
'"daughter of no. 10" probably refers to Jane MacKay (family no.10, crossed out)'

* The following note applies to line 36:
'"son of no. 10" probably refers to Jane MacKay (family no.10, crossed out)'

* The following note applies to line 37:
'"Lodger and Employee of no. 9" probably refers to John Smith (family no. 9, crossed out)'

* The following note applies to line 38:
'"Lodger and Employee of no. 9" probably refers to John Smith (family no. 9, crossed out)'

* The following note applies to line 39:
'"Lodger and Employee of no. 9" probably refers to John Smith (family no. 9, crossed out)'

* The following note applies to line 40:
'"Lodger and Employee of no. 9" probably refers to John Smith (family no. 9, crossed out)'

* The following note applies to line 41:
'family no. 11 (crossed out)'

* The following note applies to line 44:
'"Employee of no. 11" probably refers to Tom Seng (Charles) (family no. 11, crossed out)'

* The following note applies to line 50:
'another surname (illegible) is written on the line, but Vienna is written below'

* The following note applies to line 50:
'surname Vicoena(?) or Vienna(?) or something else???'

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
1   1 MaxwellWilliam M   Lodger with no. 3 S Sep 1 1879 22
* On line 1, the value for the household field is "1", the suggested correction is "".
Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
The following comment was attached: Household number is crossed out.
 
Field Value Correction Note
2   1 BrewsterJames Howard M   Lodger with no. 3 S Mar 6 1878 23
* On line 2, the value for the household field is "1", the suggested correction is "".
Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
The following comment was attached: Household number is crossed out.
 
Field Value Correction Note
14   3 Negrean(?)John M   Head M Jun 13   41
* On line 14, the value for the surname field is "Negrean(?)", the suggested correction is "Negrean".
The following comment was attached: There are these Negrean records in Vital Event indexes, BC Archives.
 
Field Value Correction Note
14   3 Negrean(?)John M   Head M Jun 13   41
* On line 14, the value for the surname field is "Negrean(?)", the suggested correction is "Negtean".
Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
 
Field Value Correction Note
22   6 GaudernWm M     S Feb 23 1877 24
* On line 22, the value for the givens field is "Wm", the suggested correction is "William".
 
Field Value Correction Note
37   8 FlemingRobert W. M   Lodger & Employee of no. 9 S Nov 17 1880 20
* On line 37, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Lodger ", the suggested correction is "Lodger of no. 9".
Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
 
Field Value Correction Note
38   8 Nselkapesket(?)Thomas M   Lodger & Employee of no. 9 S Other: not known abt. 22
* On line 38, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Lodger ", the suggested correction is "Employee of no. 9".
Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
 
Field Value Correction Note
39   8 Nltekatem(?)Wal? M   Lodger & Employee of no. 9 S Other: not known abt. 19
* On line 39, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Lodger ", the suggested correction is "Employee no. 9".
Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
 
Field Value Correction Note
39   8 Nltekatem(?)Wal? M   Lodger & Employee of no. 9 S Other: not known abt. 19
* On line 39, the value for the givens field is "Wal?", the suggested correction is "Walter".
 
Field Value Correction Note
40   8 LeeMong (Jack) M   Lodger & Employee of no. 9 S Other: not known abt. 60
* On line 40, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Lodger ", the suggested correction is "Employee no. 9".
Submitted by Ghislaine Joiner.
 
Field Value Correction Note
49   10 Vi???aRobert M   Nephew of lines 5 & 6(?) S Jun 15 1898 3
* On line 49, the value for the surname field is "Vi???a", the suggested correction is "Vienna".
 
Field Value Correction Note
49   10 Vi???aRobert M   Nephew of lines 5 & 6(?) S Jun 15 1898 3
* On line 49, the value for the surname field is "Vi???a", the suggested correction is "Vienna".
 
Field Value Correction Note
49   10 Vi???aRobert M   Nephew of lines 5 & 6(?) S Jun 15 1898 3
* On line 49, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Nephew of lines 5 ", the suggested correction is "Nephew of lines 5 & 6 ".
The following comment was attached: Nephew of Helen and Rachel Oppenheim
 
Field Value Correction Note
50   10 Vicoena(?)Ruby F   Niece of line 5 & 6 & 1(?) S Mar 9 1899 2
* On line 50, the value for the surname field is "Vicoena(?)", the suggested correction is "Oppenheim ".
The following comment was attached: I just got Ruby's marriage & death records, and she is the daughter of Rachel Oppenheim; if one looks at the actual document, one can see Oppenheim written just before Ruby's name
 
Field Value Correction Note
50   10 Vicoena(?)Ruby F   Niece of line 5 & 6 & 1(?) S Mar 9 1899 2
* On line 50, the value for the otherRelationship field is "Niece of line 5 ", the suggested correction is "Niece of line 5 & 6 & Family 1".
The following comment was attached: I take this to mean Family 1 at the top of page, niece of Helen & Rachel Oppenheim
 
Field Value Correction Note
50   10 Vicoena(?)Ruby F   Niece of line 5 & 6 & 1(?) S Mar 9 1899 2
* On line 50, the value for the surname field is "Vicoena(?)", the suggested correction is "Vienna Oppenheim".
The following comment was attached: Look closely to see Vienna
 
Field Value Correction Note
50   10 Vicoena(?)Ruby F   Niece of line 5 & 6 & 1(?) S Mar 9 1899 2
* On line 50, the value for the surname field is "Vicoena(?)", the suggested correction is "Vienna Oppenheim".
The following comment was attached: This is Ruby Oppenheim, niece of Helen & Rachel Oppenheim of Lines 5 & 6
 

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: l-7 District: YALE & CARIBOO National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com