Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
|
66 |
Lapierre Emma |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 3 |
1873 |
27
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
Lapierre Antoinette |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 16 |
1895 |
6
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
Lapierre Ernest |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 18 |
1896 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
Lapierre Thérese |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 11 |
1899 |
2
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
Lapierre Juliette |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 20 |
1900 |
5/12
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
Plenchet Daniel |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Sep 9 |
1850 |
50
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
Plenchet Olivine |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Nov 10 |
1854 |
46
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
Plenchet Rachel |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 28 |
1891 |
19
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
Plenchet Daniel |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 1 |
1883 |
17
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
Plenchet Louise |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Oct 18 |
1884 |
16
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
Belland Maarie |
F |
|
Head |
W |
Jun 12 |
1840 |
60
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
Gaumont Lucie |
F |
|
Lodger |
S |
Apr 8 |
1851 |
49
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
Pereault Philippe |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jul 31 |
1875 |
25
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
Pereault Marie A |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Apr 29 |
1881 |
29
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
Pereault Rosie J |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 12 |
1900 |
10/12
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
Casault Marie |
F |
|
Domestic |
S |
Oct 4 |
1884 |
16
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
Choquette Joseph |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jul 5 |
1866 |
34
|
|
|
01 |
|
70 |
Choquette Marie L |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 30 |
1868 |
32
|
|
|
01 |
|
70 |
Choquette Edmée |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Apr 19 |
1889 |
11
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
Choquette Lauranzo |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jun 8 |
1890 |
10
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
Choquette Henri |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 22 |
1891 |
9
|
|
|
01** |
|
70 |
Choquette Marie A |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 9 |
1893 |
8
|
|
|
01 |
|
70 |
Choquette Honorine |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 5 |
1894 |
6
|
|
|
01 |
|
70 |
Choquette Belatuce |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 1 |
1896 |
5
|
|
|
01 |
|
70 |
Choquette Eugine |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 7 |
1897 |
3
|
|
|
01 |
|
70 |
Choquette Georges |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 1 |
1899 |
2
|
|
|
01 |
|
71 |
Baril Elisée |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Feb 22 |
1871 |
30
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
Baril Marie |
F |
|
Wife |
S |
Nov 26 |
1870 |
30
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
Baril Alice |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Apr 6 |
1895 |
5
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
Baril Edmée |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 31 |
1896 |
4
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
Baril Ernest |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 2 |
1898 |
3
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
Baril Albert |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 12 |
1899 |
1
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
Baril René |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 28 |
1901 |
2/12
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
Beaudry Hermenegile |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jul 21 |
1854 |
46
|
|
|
01 |
|
72 |
Beaudry Emmerise |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 8 |
1855 |
45
|
|
|
01 |
|
72 |
Beaudry Alice |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Apr 31 |
1883 |
17
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
Beaudry Leopole |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 27 |
1886 |
14
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
Beaudry Emile |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Dec 17 |
1889 |
11
|
|
|
01 |
|
72 |
Beaudry Henri |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 22 |
1891 |
9
|
|
|
01 |
|
72 |
Beaudry Hubert |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Sep 16 |
1893 |
7
|
|
|
01 |
|
72 |
Beaudry Marie D |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 19 |
1897 |
4
|
|
|
01 |
|
73 |
Beaudry Clovis |
M |
|
Lodger |
M |
Sep 25 |
1834 |
66
|
|
|
01 |
|
73 |
Beaudry Scollestic |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Feb 10 |
1833 |
68
|
|
|
01 |
|
74 |
Magnan Traislote |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jun 16 |
1854 |
42
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
Magnan Rosé |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jan 16 |
1860 |
39
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
Magnan Theodora |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jun 16 |
1882 |
18
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
Magnan Joseph |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 28 |
1884 |
16
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
Magnan Flore |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 8 |
1887 |
13
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
Dionne Joseph |
M |
|
Head |
W |
Nov 16 |
1868 |
32
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
Dionne Seleste |
F |
|
Mother |
W |
Nov 18 |
1842 |
58
|
|
|
|
Field Correction Notes on this page
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a
proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If
the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line.
Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The
presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to
consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy
of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note |
28 |
|
71 |
Baril | Marie |
F |
|
Wife |
S |
Nov 26 |
1870 |
30 |
On line 28,
the value for the maritalStatus
field is "S",
the suggested correction is "M".
|
|
To register as a person researching someone on this page
click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: d-5
District: OTTAWA (City/Cité)
National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com