Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
|
68 |
Poirier Alex |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Mar 20 |
1859 |
42
|
|
|
|
68 |
Poirier Fideline |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 28 |
1864 |
36
|
|
|
|
68 |
Poirier Joseph |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 7 |
1888 |
12
|
|
|
|
68 |
Poirier Lorenzo |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 18 |
1891 |
10
|
|
|
|
68 |
Poirier Dianne |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 8 |
1893 |
7
|
|
|
|
68 |
Poirier Biatrice |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 1 |
1895 |
5
|
|
|
|
68 |
Poirier Henri |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jul 18 |
1897 |
3
|
|
|
|
68 |
Poirier Velnar |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 1 |
1899 |
2
|
|
|
|
68 |
Poirier Hector |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 26 |
1900 |
11/12
|
|
|
|
69 |
Demers Jean Baptiste |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Oct 4 |
1842 |
59
|
|
|
|
69 |
Demers Josephine |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jul 8 |
1848 |
52
|
|
|
|
69 |
Demers Eugéne |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Oct 14 |
1881 |
20
|
|
|
|
69 |
Demers Arthur |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 8 |
1884 |
17
|
|
|
|
69 |
Demers Omer |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Sep 17 |
1886 |
14
|
|
|
|
69 |
Demers Marie Louise |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Feb 3 |
1878 |
23
|
|
|
|
70 |
Demers Adalard |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Feb 3 |
1873 |
28
|
|
|
|
70 |
Demers Léonie |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jan 5 |
1879 |
22
|
|
|
|
70 |
Demers Ovila |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Sep 9 |
1900 |
6/12
|
|
|
|
71 |
Raymond Joseph |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jun 5 |
1869 |
31
|
|
|
|
71 |
Raymond Leda |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jan 6 |
1879 |
22
|
|
|
|
72 |
Hardie Hector |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Feb 8 |
1859 |
42
|
|
|
|
72 |
Hardie Marie Ann |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jul 11 |
1859 |
41
|
|
|
|
72 |
Boucher Hormidas |
M |
|
Fils adoptif |
S |
Apr 16 |
1880 |
20
|
|
|
|
73 |
Marella Joseph |
M |
|
Head |
M |
|
1872 |
29
|
|
|
|
73 |
Marella Rosa |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Feb 18 |
1866 |
35
|
|
|
|
73 |
Marella Johnny |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 10 |
1891 |
10
|
|
|
|
74 |
Liberty Joseph |
M |
|
Head |
M |
|
1873 |
28
|
|
|
|
74 |
Liberty Ironee |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Nov 14 |
1876 |
24
|
|
|
|
74 |
Liberty Anchilo |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 29 |
1900 |
1
|
|
|
|
75 |
Sito Tai |
M |
|
Head |
M |
|
1868 |
33
|
|
|
|
75 |
Sito Catherine |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec |
1869 |
32
|
|
|
|
75 |
Sito Marie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 2 |
1894 |
7
|
|
|
|
75 |
Antonioni John |
M |
|
Lodger |
M |
|
1863 |
38
|
|
|
|
75 |
Dominnico Fosi |
M |
|
Father |
W |
Dont Know |
1846 |
54
|
|
|
|
76 |
Dénoyer Amédé |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Feb 10 |
1864 |
37
|
|
|
|
75 |
Dénoyer Délina |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Mar 15 |
1868 |
33
|
|
|
|
76 |
Dénoyer Marie |
F |
|
Mother |
W |
|
1839 |
63
|
|
|
|
76 |
Dénoyer Jean Baptiste |
M |
|
Brother |
S |
Aug 10 |
1876 |
24
|
|
|
|
76 |
Dénoyer Napoléon |
M |
|
Head |
M |
May 10 |
1874 |
26
|
|
|
|
76 |
Dénoyer Marseline |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
May 10 |
1874 |
26
|
|
|
|
76 |
Dénoyer Rosnéa |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Sep 7 |
1900 |
1
|
|
|
|
77 |
Laberge Théo |
M |
|
Head |
M |
|
1863 |
37
|
|
|
|
77 |
Laberge Emélie |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Aug |
1873 |
17
|
|
|
|
77 |
Laberge Régina |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 20 |
1883 |
18
|
|
|
|
77 |
Laberge Oswald |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 18 |
1884 |
16
|
|
|
|
77 |
Laberge Velmar |
M |
|
Son |
S |
May 21 |
1889 |
11
|
|
|
|
77 |
Laberge Yvonne |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
May 10 |
1891 |
90
|
|
|
|
77 |
Laberge Armond |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Feb 10 |
1894 |
7
|
|
|
|
77 |
Laberge Delina |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Apr 10 |
1898 |
2
|
|
|
|
77 |
Laberge Sophie |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jul 20 |
1900 |
9 mos.
|
|
|
Line Notes On This Page
The following note applies to line 18:
'First name Ovila, sex 'male', relationship 'son'' |
The following note applies to line 35:
'I believe first name to be Amédé' |
The following note applies to line 38:
'Month of birth should be Aout' |
The following note applies to line 44:
'Relationship should be 'daughter'' |
The following note applies to line 46:
'Relationship should be 'son'' |
Field Correction Notes on this page
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a
proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If
the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line.
Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The
presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to
consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy
of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note |
2 |
|
68 |
Poirier | Fideline |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 28 |
1864 |
36 |
On line 2,
the value for the givens
field is "Fideline",
the suggested correction is "Frédeline". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: I see Frédeline. Compare the "é" with Béatrice in line 6 that needs to be corrected also.
|
This correction was evaluated by Roberta Clark:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
2 |
|
68 |
Poirier | Fideline |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 28 |
1864 |
36 |
On line 2,
the value for the givens
field is "Fiaeline",
the suggested correction is "Fiseline".
|
This correction was evaluated by Roberta Clark:
A change other than the suggested correction has been made, I have checked the image of the original form and agree with the current value
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
2 |
|
68 |
Poirier | Fideline |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Dec 28 |
1864 |
36 |
On line 2,
the value for the givens
field is "Fideline",
the suggested correction is "Frédeline".
The following comment was attached: Or possibly Fréseline. Hard to tell
|
This correction was evaluated by Roberta Clark:
I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
6 |
|
68 |
Poirier | Biatrice |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 1 |
1895 |
5 |
On line 6,
the value for the givens
field is "Biatrice",
the suggested correction is "Béatrice".
|
This correction was evaluated by Roberta Clark:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
6 |
|
68 |
Poirier | Biatrice |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 1 |
1895 |
5 |
On line 6,
the value for the givens
field is "Biatrice",
the suggested correction is "Béatrice". Submitted anonymously.
The following comment was attached: "i" and "é" that look the same are common problems of handwriting.
|
This correction was evaluated by Roberta Clark:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
34 |
|
75 |
Dominnico | Fosi |
M |
|
Father |
W |
Other: Dont Know |
1846 |
54 |
On line 34,
the value for the givens
field is "Tosi",
the suggested correction is "José".
|
This correction was evaluated by Roberta Clark:
I have checked the image of the original form and decided to make a change other than what the correction suggested.
|
|
To register as a person researching someone on this page
click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: a-2
District: OTTAWA (City/Cité)
National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com