| Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
| L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | Links | ||||||||||
| H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 152 | Williams Jerome | F | Daughter | S | Aug 21 | 1892 |
|
Links | ||||
| 2 | 152 | Williams Agustia | F | Daughter | S | Nov 23 | 1895 |
|
Links | ||||
| 3 | 152 | Williams Allas B | F | Daughter | S | Sep 16 | 1900 |
|
Links | ||||
| 4 | 152 | Williams Richard | M | Uncle | S | Apr 11 | 1840 |
|
Links | ||||
| 5 | 152 | Williams Ellen | F | G Mother | W | Apr 11 | 1808 |
|
|||||
| 6 | 153 | Williams Thomas | M | Head | M | Jul 14 | 1856 |
|
Links | ||||
| 7 | 153 | Williams Christy A | F | Wife | M | Jun 15 | 1870 |
|
Links | ||||
| 8 | 153 | Williams Earnest | M | Son | S | Aug 26 | 1890 |
|
Links | ||||
| 9 | 153 | Williams Odessa | F | Daughter | S | Apr 19 | 1892 |
|
|||||
| 10 | 153 | Williams Mable | F | Daughter | S | May 29 | 1894 |
|
Links | ||||
| 11 | 153 | Williams Harry W | M | Son | S | Jul 28 | 1900 |
|
Links | ||||
| 12 | 154 | Williams John | M | Head | M | Apr 20 | 1851 |
|
Links | ||||
13 |
154 | Williams Eliza | F | Wife | M | Dec 28 | 1851 |
|
Links | ||||
| 14 | 154 | Williams Mary E | F | Daughter | S | Aug 25 | 1875 |
|
|||||
15 |
154 | Williams John S | M | Son | S | Jun 15 | 1878 |
|
|||||
| 16 | 154 | Williams Lemuel E | M | Son | S | Oct 6 | 1878 |
|
Links | ||||
| 17 | 154 | Williams Lorata A | F | Daughter | S | Feb 28 | 1880 |
|
|||||
| 18 | 154 | Williams Edgar S | M | Son | S | Oct 16 | 1881 |
|
|||||
| 19 | 154 | Williams Howard M | M | Son | S | May 16 | 1883 |
|
Links | ||||
| 20 | 154 | Williams Ada A | F | Daughter | S | Mar 31 | 1885 |
|
|||||
| 21 | 154 | Williams Wallace L | M | Son | S | Oct 20 | 1887 |
|
|||||
| 22 | 154 | Williams Edith I | F | Daughter | S | Nov 11 | 1889 |
|
|||||
| 23 | 154 | Williams Viloa M | F | Daughter | S | Jan 21 | 1892 |
|
|||||
| 24 | 155 | Grant Thomas | M | Head | M | Jan | 1854 |
|
Links | ||||
| 25 | 155 | Grant Jane | F | Wife | M | May 11 | 1861 |
|
Links | ||||
| 26 | 155 | Grant Charlie | M | Son | S | Jul 12 | 1888 |
|
Links | ||||
| 27 | 155 | Grant Moriss | M | Son | S | Jul 28 | 1891 |
|
Links | ||||
| 28 | 155 | Grant Hilda | F | Daughter | S | Jan 9 | 1893 |
|
Links | ||||
| 29 | 155 | Williams George | M | B in Law | S | May 30 | 1865 |
|
Links | ||||
| 30 | 156 | Mosher John | M | Head | M |
|
Links | ||||||
31 |
156 | Mosher Allace | F | Wife | M | Apr 3 | 1861 |
|
Links | ||||
| 32 | 156 | Mosher Lylly B | F | Daughter | S | Jul 4 | 1877 |
|
Links | ||||
33 |
156 | Mosher Celia(?) | F | Daughter | S | Apr 16 | 1885 |
|
|||||
| 34 | 156 | Mosher Adie | F | Daughter | S | May 14 | 1886 |
|
|||||
| 35 | 156 | Mosher Ella M | F | Daughter | S | May 16 | 1888 |
|
Links | ||||
| 36 | 156 | Mosher William | M | Son | S | Feb 16 | 1891 |
|
Links | ||||
| 37 | 156 | Mosher Nelson S. | M | Son | S | Jun 1 | 1892 |
|
Links | ||||
| 38 | 156 | Mosher Stephen E | M | Son | S | Sep 29 | 1894 |
|
Links | ||||
| 39 | 156 | Mosher John S | M | Son | S | Oct 31 | 1896 |
|
Links | ||||
| 40 | 156 | Mosher Sandy C | M | Son | S | Mar 16 | 1898 |
|
|||||
| 41 | 156 | Mosher Hazel M | F | Daughter | S | Feb 19 | 1901 |
|
Links | ||||
| 42 | 157 | Baker Stephen | M | Head | M | Mar 5 | 1836 |
|
Links | ||||
| 43 | 157 | Baker Anna | F | Wife | M | May 5 | 1836 |
|
|||||
| 44 | 157 | Baker John | M | Son | M | Jul 15 | 1878 |
|
Links | ||||
| 45 | 157 | Baker Jane | F | Son Wife | M | Mar 15 | 1876 |
|
Links | ||||
| 46 | 157 | Baker Annie | F | Granddaughter | S | Aug 29 | 1896 |
|
|||||
| 47 | 157 | Baker Regnal | M | Grandson | S | Jul 3 | 1898 |
|
Links | ||||
| 48 | 157 | Baker Mamie | F | Granddaughter | S | Jan 6 | 1900 |
|
Links | ||||
| 49 | 158 | William Michiel | M | Head | M | Nov 30 | 1856 |
|
Links | ||||
50 |
158 | William Ellen | M | Wife | M | Apr 6 |
|
||||||
The following note applies to line 31:
| 'Age 40 has been "corrected" to 39 by a later hand -- but was it the age or the birth year that was wrong?' |
The following note applies to line 33:
| 'Age 16 has been corrected to 15 by a later hand -- but was the age wrong or the birth year?' |
The following note applies to line 50:
| 'Sex should be F, but M was the original entry....' |
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 13 | 154 | Williams | Eliza | F | Wife | M | Dec 28 | 1851 | 50 | ||
On line 13,
the value for the age
field is "50",
the suggested correction is "49". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by Mark Young: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: Someone has pencilled a 49 over the original 50 -- maybe the enumerator, maybe someone later.... | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 13 | 154 | Williams | Eliza | F | Wife | M | Dec 28 | 1851 | 50 | ||
On line 13,
the value for the year
field is "1851",
the suggested correction is "1852". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by Mark Young: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: It could be a 2, but then the age should be 48, not 50 (or even 49) | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 15 | 154 | Williams | John S | M | Son | S | Jun 15 | 1878 | 23 | ||
On line 15,
the value for the year
field is "1878",
the suggested correction is "1876". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by Mark Young: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: It could be a 7 -- that would match the age -- but it looks more like an 8 than a 7 or a 6 | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 31 | 156 | Mosher | Allace | F | Wife | M | Apr 3 | 1861 | 40 | ||
On line 31,
the value for the age
field is "40",
the suggested correction is "39". Submitted by Tom Pollock. The following comment was attached: As corrected on image. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 33 | 156 | Mosher | Celia(?) | F | Daughter | S | Apr 16 | 1885 | 16 | ||
On line 33,
the value for the age
field is "16",
the suggested correction is "15". Submitted by Tom Pollock. The following comment was attached: As corrected on image. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 33 | 156 | Mosher | Celia(?) | F | Daughter | S | Apr 16 | 1885 | 16 | ||
On line 33,
the value for the givens
field is "?lia",
the suggested correction is "Cicelia". Submitted by Tom Pollock. The following comment was attached: 'Cic' written over 'Lyd'? | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by Mark Young: I have checked the image of the original form and decided to make a change other than what the correction suggested. This comment was added: Looks more like "Cel" over "Lyl" to me -- but I can't find her on the 1911, so no help from there.... | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 50 | 158 | William | Ellen | M | Wife | M | Apr 6 | 37 | |||
On line 50,
the value for the sex
field is "M",
the suggested correction is "F". Submitted by Tom Pollock. The following comment was attached: As corrected on image. | |||||||||||
| This correction was evaluated by Mark Young: I have checked the image of the original and agree the suggested change should be made | |||||||||||
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: c(1) District: HALIFAX National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com