Field Value Correction Note |
5 |
|
27 |
Pitt | Elizabeth |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jul 21 |
1846 |
54 |
On line 5,
the value for the lineNo
field is "5",
the suggested correction is "99".
The following comment was attached: Same individual entered twice by transcriber.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
6 |
|
27 |
Pitt | Sylvester L. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 6 |
1878 |
22 |
On line 6,
the value for the lineNo
field is "6",
the suggested correction is "5".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
7 |
|
27 |
Pitt | Esly |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 2 |
1881 |
19 |
On line 7,
the value for the lineNo
field is "7",
the suggested correction is "6".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
7 |
|
27 |
Pitt | Esly |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Aug 2 |
1881 |
19 |
On line 7,
the value for the givens
field is "Esly",
the suggested correction is "Esly J.". Submitted by BJN.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
8 |
|
27 |
Pitt | Edith L. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 17 |
1884 |
17 |
On line 8,
the value for the lineNo
field is "8",
the suggested correction is "7".
|
This correction was evaluated by Mary Lou Fry:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
9 |
|
28 |
Pitt | William |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Jul 13 |
1867 |
32 |
On line 9,
the value for the lineNo
field is "9",
the suggested correction is "8".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
10 |
|
28 |
Pitt | Mary L. |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Aug 26 |
1872 |
28 |
On line 10,
the value for the lineNo
field is "10",
the suggested correction is "9".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
11 |
|
28 |
Pitt | Anson D. |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Nov 22 |
1894 |
6 |
On line 11,
the value for the lineNo
field is "11",
the suggested correction is "10".
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
12 |
|
28 |
Pitt | Ida A. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Jan 5 |
1897 |
4 |
On line 12,
the value for the lineNo
field is "12",
the suggested correction is "11".
|
This correction was evaluated by Mary Lou Fry:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
13 |
|
28 |
Pitt | Ruby L. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Nov 11 |
1898 |
2 |
On line 13,
the value for the lineNo
field is "13",
the suggested correction is "12".
|
This correction was evaluated by Mary Lou Fry:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
14 |
|
28 |
Sloan | Sarah J. |
F |
|
Domestic |
S |
Jan 31 |
1878 |
23 |
On line 14,
the value for the day
field is "11",
the suggested correction is "17".
|
This correction was evaluated by Mary Lou Fry:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
14 |
|
28 |
Sloan | Sarah J. |
F |
|
Domestic |
S |
Jan 31 |
1878 |
23 |
On line 14,
the value for the lineNo
field is "14",
the suggested correction is "13".
|
This correction was evaluated by Mary Lou Fry:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
15 |
|
29 |
Wilson | Alexander |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 22 |
1856 |
45 |
On line 15,
the value for the givens
field is "Sarah",
the suggested correction is "Sarah J.".
|
This correction was evaluated by Mary Lou Fry:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
15 |
|
29 |
Wilson | Alexander |
M |
|
Head |
M |
Apr 22 |
1856 |
45 |
On line 15,
the value for the lineNo
field is "15",
the suggested correction is "14".
|
This correction was evaluated by Mary Lou Fry:
I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
20 |
|
29 |
Wilson | Eva L. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 10 |
1882 |
9 |
On line 20,
the value for the year
field is "1882",
the suggested correction is "1892". Submitted by BJN.
The following comment was attached: Date must be 1892, as she is 9; also brother born in 1882.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
20 |
|
29 |
Wilson | Eva L. |
F |
|
Daughter |
S |
Mar 10 |
1882 |
9 |
On line 20,
the value for the year
field is "1882",
the suggested correction is "1892". Submitted by BJN.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
21 |
|
29 |
Billimgs | John E. |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
Jan 23 |
1880 |
21 |
On line 21,
the value for the surname
field is "Billimgs",
the suggested correction is "Billings". Submitted by BJN.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
21 |
|
29 |
Billimgs | John E. |
M |
|
Servant |
S |
Jan 23 |
1880 |
21 |
On line 21,
the value for the surname
field is "Billimgs",
the suggested correction is "Billings". Submitted anonymously.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
29 |
|
31 |
Adams | Basil |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Apr 29 |
1896 |
4 |
On line 29,
the value for the month
field is "Apr",
the suggested correction is "Aug". Submitted by BJN.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
32 |
|
32 |
Bariager | Agness |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Nov 6 |
1848 |
64 |
On line 32,
the value for the year
field is "1848",
the suggested correction is "1846". Submitted by BJN.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
33 |
|
32 |
Bariager | Fredrick |
M |
|
Son |
S |
Jan 29 |
1883 |
18 |
On line 33,
the value for the givens
field is "Fredrick",
the suggested correction is "Frederick". Submitted by BJN.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
36 |
|
33 |
Swift | Harper |
M |
|
Son |
M |
Jan 13 |
1888 |
12 |
On line 36,
the value for the month
field is "Jan",
the suggested correction is "Jul". Submitted by BJN.
|
|
Field Value Correction Note |
49 |
|
35 |
Leizert | Charlotte |
F |
|
Wife |
M |
Jan 22 |
1865 |
35 |
On line 49,
the value for the age
field is "35",
the suggested correction is "36". Submitted by BJN.
|
|