| Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
| L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | Links | ||||||||||
| H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82 | Tisdale John | M | Head | M | May 15 | 1860 |
|
|||||
| 2 | 82 | Tisdale Emley | F | Wife | M | Apr 2 | 1865 |
|
|||||
| 3 | 82 | Tisdale Rosetta | F | Daughter | S | Jan 11 | 1884 |
|
|||||
| 4 | 82 | Tisdale Silva | F | Daughter | S | Nov 2 | 1884 |
|
|||||
| 5 | 82 | Tisdale Albert | M | Son | S | May 23 | 1887 |
|
|||||
| 6 | 82 | Tisdale Irene | F | Daughter | S | Jul 4 | 1889 |
|
|||||
7 |
82 | Tisdale Roy | M | Son | S | Mar 4 | 1893 |
|
|||||
| 8 | 82 | Tisdale Ross | M | Son | S | Dec 8 | 1896 |
|
|||||
| 9 | 83 | Tisdale George | M | Head | M | Jan 16 | 1874 |
|
Links | ||||
10 |
83 | Tisdale Edith | F | Wife | M | Aug 29 | 1878 |
|
Links | ||||
| 11 | 83 | Tisdale Norman | M | Son | S | Dec 24 | 1898 |
|
Links | ||||
| 12 | 84 | Tisdale Mitchel | M | Head | M | Jan 15 | 1846 |
|
|||||
| 13 | 84 | Tisdale Sarah | F | Wife | M | Oct 9 | 1847 |
|
|||||
| 14 | 84 | Tisdale Daisy | F | Daughter | S | Jan 13 | 1880 |
|
|||||
| 15 | 84 | Tisdale Ethel | F | Daughter | S | Jun 4 | 1882 |
|
|||||
| 16 | 84 | Tisdale Harry | M | Son | S | Feb 23 | 1885 |
|
|||||
| 17 | 84 | Tisdale Hubert | M | Son | S | Jan 11 | 1888 |
|
|||||
| 18 | 85 | Tisdale Louis | M | Head | M | Nov 12 | 1852 |
|
Links | ||||
| 19 | 85 | Tisdale Annie | F | Wife | M | Jan 26 | 1855 |
|
Links | ||||
| 20 | 85 | Tisdale Harry | M | Son | S | Dec 9 | 1886 |
|
|||||
| 21 | 85 | Tisdale Lulu | F | Daughter | S | Mar 27 | 1889 |
|
Links | ||||
| 22 | 85 | Tisdale William | M | Son | S | Apr 27 | 1892 |
|
Links | ||||
| 23 | 85 | Tisdale Pearl | F | Daughter | S | Aug 30 | 1894 |
|
Links | ||||
| 24 | 86 | Tisdale Rose | F | Head | W | May 20 | 1821 |
|
|||||
| 25 | 86 | Tisdale John | M | Grandson | S | Jun 12 | 1866 |
|
|||||
| 26 | 87 | Bennet William | M | Head | M | Sep 14 | 1867 |
|
|||||
| 27 | 87 | Bennet Mary | F | Wife | M | Nov 28 | 1867 |
|
|||||
| 28 | 87 | Bennet Myrtle | F | Daughter | S | Jul 2 | 1889 |
|
|||||
| 29 | 87 | Bennet Marian | F | Daughter | S | Oct 4 | 1893 |
|
|||||
| 30 | 87 | Bennet Raymond | M | Son | S | Oct 23 | 1895 |
|
|||||
31 |
87 | Bennet William | M | Son | S | Apr 21 | 189? |
|
|||||
| 32 | 88 | Burnside Edward | M | Head | M | Jan 10 | 1853 |
|
|||||
| 33 | 88 | Burnside Susan | F | Wife | M | Oct 16 | 1853 |
|
|||||
| 34 | 88 | Burnside Ada | F | Daughter | S | Oct 12 | 1896 |
|
|||||
| 35 | 88 | Armstrong Jane | F | Aunt | W | Aug 11 | 1836 |
|
|||||
36 |
89 | Butler William | M | Head | M | May 14 | 1852 |
|
|||||
| 37 | 89 | Butler Mary E. | F | Wife | M | Dec 18 | 1858 |
|
|||||
| 38 | 89 | Butler Mary E. M. | F | Daughter | S | Jun 3 | 1886 |
|
|||||
| 39 | 89 | Butler Henry ?? | M | Son | S | Feb 1 | 1892 |
|
|||||
| 40 | 89 | Thompson Bertha | F | Governess | S | Jan 12 | 1874 |
|
|||||
| 41 | 89 | Potter Mary E. | F | Domestic | S | Dec 27 | 1879 |
|
|||||
42 |
89 | Potter John O. | M | Domestic | S | Nov 17 | 1883 |
|
|||||
| 43 | 90 | Nelson Alex. | M | Head | M | Oct 14 | 1873 |
|
|||||
44 |
90 | Nelson Careline | F | Wife | M | Jun 9 | 1875 |
|
|||||
| 45 | 90 | Nelson Isobel | F | Daughter | S | Aug 24 | 1899 |
|
|||||
46 |
91 | Douder Richard | M | Head | M | Dec 24 | 1833 |
|
|||||
| 47 | 91 | Douder Henrietta | F | Wife | M | Apr 11 | 1853 |
|
|||||
| 48 | 92 | Smith Robert | M | Head | M | May 19 | 1834 |
|
|||||
| 49 | 92 | Smith Belinda | F | Wife | M | Jan 10 | 1866 |
|
|||||
50 |
92 | Snider Mosis | M | Step Son | S | Jan 1 | 1882 |
|
|||||
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 7 | 82 | Tisdale | Roy | M | Son | S | Mar 4 | 1893 | Illegible | ||
On line 7,
the value for the age
field is "Illegible",
the suggested correction is "7". Submitted by Robert Cardwell. The following comment was attached: A definate "7" appears to have been entered by the enumerator to the right of the "smudge". -R.C. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 7 | 82 | Tisdale | Roy | M | Son | S | Mar 4 | 1893 | Illegible | ||
On line 7,
the value for the age
field is "Illegible",
the suggested correction is "7". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: The legible portion of the number can only be part of a 7. -RC | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 7 | 82 | Tisdale | Roy | M | Son | S | Mar 4 | 1893 | Illegible | ||
On line 7,
the value for the age
field is "Illegible",
the suggested correction is "7". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: The legible portion of the number can only be part of a 7. -RC | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 10 | 83 | Tisdale | Edith | F | Wife | M | Aug 29 | 1878 | 22 | ||
On line 10,
the value for the day
field is "29",
the suggested correction is "25". Submitted by Robert Cardwell. The following comment was attached: This numerator writes his 5s like this one. The "tail" of the J above passes through the top of the 5 to giving the illusion of a closed loop -R.C. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 31 | 87 | Bennet | William | M | Son | S | Apr 21 | 189? | 1 | ||
On line 31,
the value for the year
field is "189?",
the suggested correction is "1890". Submitted by Robert Cardwell. The following comment was attached: It looks like the enumerator first wrote 1899, started a change to 1900 but forgot to change the 189 to 190. - R.C. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 36 | 89 | Butler | William | M | Head | M | May 14 | 1852 | 49 | ||
On line 36,
the value for the age
field is "49",
the suggested correction is "48". Submitted by Robert Cardwell. The following comment was attached: On a close look the second digit is formed with one continuous line similar to way this enum. forms his 8s, but he has overlapped the bottom loop. He forms 9s with two definate parts. - R. C. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 42 | 89 | Potter | John O. | M | Domestic | S | Nov 17 | 1883 | 17 | ||
On line 42,
the value for the givens
field is "John O.",
the suggested correction is "John P.". Submitted by Robert Cardwell. The following comment was attached: Looking closely at the penstroke direction used and comparing with other Os & Ps reveals this to be most likely a 'P". -R.C. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 44 | 90 | Nelson | Careline | F | Wife | M | Jun 9 | 1875 | 26 | ||
On line 44,
the value for the givens
field is "Careline",
the suggested correction is "Emeline". Submitted by Robert Cardwell. The following comment was attached: As entered by the enumerator. -R.C. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 46 | 91 | Douder | Richard | M | Head | M | Dec 24 | 1833 | 68 | ||
On line 46,
the value for the surname
field is "Douder",
the suggested correction is "Dowler". Submitted by Robert Cardwell. The following comment was attached: As writen by the enumereator with the w & l confusingly tight. A well researched family with no alternative spelling. - R. C. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 50 | 92 | Snider | Mosis | M | Step Son | S | Jan 1 | 1882 | 19 | ||
On line 50,
the value for the givens
field is "Mosis",
the suggested correction is "Mosie". Submitted by Robert Cardwell. The following comment was attached: The final letter isn't clear until enlarged when it appears to be an added "e" to "Mosi" rather than an "s". - R.C. | |||||||||||
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: d-1 District: FRONTENAC National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com