Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
|
|
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
@ next to the line number indicates contact information for someone
researching this person, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | Links | ||||||||||
H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 52 | Burgess E Jane | F | Wife | M | Nov 11 | 1852 |
|
01 | ||||
2 | 52 | Brown M Addie | F | Hired Help | S | Sep 2 | 1882 |
|
|||||
3 | 52 | Hamilton Herman | M | Hired Help | S | Aug 10 | 1882 |
|
01 | ||||
4 | 53 | Hartzell Cyrus | M | Head | M | Oct 9 | 1857 |
|
|||||
5 | 53 | Hartzell O Emma | F | Wife | M | 1871 |
|
||||||
6 | 53 | Hartzell Henry | M | Son | S | Nov 2 | 1886 |
|
|||||
7 | 53 | Hartzell John | M | Son | S | Feb 7 | 1890 |
|
|||||
8 | 53 | Hartzell W Lorne | M | Son | S | Aug 21 | 1895 |
|
|||||
9 | 53 | Hartzell M Anne | F | Daughter | S | Jun 19 | 1897 |
|
|||||
10 | 53 | Hartzell R Allan | M | Son | S | Apr 29 | 1899 |
|
|||||
11 | 54 | Lawton Alexander | M | Head | M | Apr 23 | 1847 |
|
01 | ||||
12 | 54 | Lawton Roxanna | F | Wife | M | Jan 10 | 185? |
|
01 | ||||
13 | 54 | Lawton C George | M | Son | S | Feb 20 | 1876 |
|
01 | ||||
14 | 54 | Lawton N Andrew | M | Son | S | Jul 10 | 1881 |
|
|||||
15 | 54 | Lawton L Harvey | M | Son | S | Sep 10 | 1886 |
|
01 | ||||
16 | 54 | Lawton E Charles | M | Son | S | Jan 30 | 1889 |
|
|||||
17 | 54 | Clark M Annie | F | Hired Help | S | Dec 2 | 1882 |
|
|||||
18 | 54 | Reisling Herbert | M | Hired Help | S | 1880 |
|
01 | |||||
19 | 55 | Sutton William | M | Head | M | Mar 28 | 1838 |
|
|||||
20 | 55 | Sutton Thersea | F | Wife | M | Jan 13 | 1845 |
|
01 | ||||
21 | 56 | Minor H William | M | Head | M | Dec 9 | 1855 |
|
|||||
22 | 56 | Minor Martha | F | Wife | M | Jun 30 | 1853 |
|
01 | ||||
23 | 56 | Vanhorn Melvin | M | Nephew | S | Dec 25 | 1892 |
|
01 | ||||
24 | 56 | Palmer William | M | Hired help | S | 1838 |
|
||||||
25 | 57 | Parker Nelson | M | Head | M | 1859 |
|
01 | |||||
26 | 57 | Parker Sophia | F | Wife | M | Aug 31 | 1859 |
|
01 | ||||
27 | 57 | Parker Theresa | F | Daughter | S | Feb 13 | 1856 |
|
|||||
28 | 57 | Parker John | M | Son | S | Jun 11 | 1879 |
|
01 | ||||
29 | 57 | Minor C Mary | F | sister in law | S | Feb 24 | 1835 |
|
|||||
30 | 57 | Gliddon Thomas | M | ? | M | Mar 22 | 1887 |
|
01 | ||||
31 | 57 | Gliddon Christana | F | Wife | M | Sep 3 | 1857 |
|
01 | ||||
32 | 57 | Gliddon Gertrude | F | Daughter | S | Mar 16 | 1882 |
|
|||||
33 | 58 | McGinnis William | M | Head | M | Jan 2 | 1860 |
|
01 | ||||
34 | 58 | McGinnis Catherine | F | Wife | M | Nov 14 | 18? |
|
01 | ||||
35 | 58 | McGinnis Earl | M | Daughter | S | Feb 28 | 1887 |
|
01 | ||||
36 | 59 | Minor Seth | M | Head | M | Aug 27 | 1861 |
|
|||||
37 | 59 | Minor Nora | F | Wife | M | Oct 20 | 1870 |
|
|||||
38 | 59 | Teeple J Randall | M | Hired Help | S | Mar 14 | 1877 |
|
01 | ||||
@ 39 | 60 | Hatch Morgan | M | Head | M | Feb 6 | 1866 |
|
01 | ||||
40 | 60 | Hatch Ruby(?) | F | Wife | M | Jul 17 | 1873 |
|
|||||
41 | 60 | Hatch P Clyde | M | Son | S | Sep 28 | 1896 |
|
|||||
42 | 60 | Hatch M Viola | F | Daughter | S | Aug 29 | 1900 |
|
|||||
43 | 60 | Hatch Y Harold | M | Son | S | Aug 29 | 1900 |
|
|||||
44 | 61 | Smale Matthew | M | Head | M | Aug 26 | 1871 |
|
01 | ||||
45 | 61 | Smale Alice | F | Wife | M | Oct 6 | 1871 |
|
01 | ||||
46 | 61 | Smale Charles | M | adopted son | S | Sep 17 | 1895 |
|
01 | ||||
47 | 62 | Burgess William | M | Head | M | Apr 19 | 1866 |
|
|||||
48 | 62 | Burgess B Clara | F | Wife | M | Jun 11 | 1866 |
|
|||||
49 | 62 | Burgess Marie | F | Daughter | S | Feb 11 | 1896 |
|
|||||
50 | 62 | Burgess Carl | M | Son | S |
|
The following note applies to line 34:
'Birth year is illegible, but is known to be 1860. See surname note.' |
The following note applies to line 35:
'My grandfather was definitely a son, not a daughter as listed.' |
In household 58, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'McGinnis', a suggested alternative surname is 'Maginnis'. The person suggesting the alternative surname provided this comment: 'The enumerator's spelling is incorrect. This is my great-grandfather and grandfather. All other documents including tombstone are 'Maginnis''.
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
12 | 54 | Lawton | Roxanna | F | Wife | M | Jan 10 | 185? | 57 | ||
On line 12, the value for the age field is "57", the suggested correction is "51". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
18 | 54 | Reisling | Herbert | M | Hired Help | S | 1880 | 20 | |||
On line 18, the value for the surname field is "Reisling", the suggested correction is "Rusling". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
25 | 57 | Parker | Nelson | M | Head | M | 1859 | 51 | |||
On line 25,
the value for the month
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Aug". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The original's field is blank, therefore it is inapropriate to add the suggested correction. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
25 | 57 | Parker | Nelson | M | Head | M | 1859 | 51 | |||
On line 25,
the value for the age
field is "51",
the suggested correction is "52". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: as you can see the dates for this family have slid out of place | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The data may have been entered out of place, but "the transcription must be true to the original". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
25 | 57 | Parker | Nelson | M | Head | M | 1859 | 51 | |||
On line 25,
the value for the year
field is "1859",
the suggested correction is "1849". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: The original value could be 1859 or 1857 but 1859 would correspond to the age entered on original. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
25 | 57 | Parker | Nelson | M | Head | M | 1859 | 51 | |||
On line 25,
the value for the year
field is "1859",
the suggested correction is "1849". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: The original value could be 1859 | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
25 | 57 | Parker | Nelson | M | Head | M | 1859 | 51 | |||
On line 25,
the value for the day
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "31". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The field is blank on the original. therefore inappropriate to enter any data. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
26 | 57 | Parker | Sophia | F | Wife | M | Aug 31 | 1859 | 51 | ||
On line 26,
the value for the month
field is "Aug",
the suggested correction is "Feb". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
26 | 57 | Parker | Sophia | F | Wife | M | Aug 31 | 1859 | 51 | ||
On line 26,
the value for the age
field is "51",
the suggested correction is "45". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: disregard previous correction on 42 | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
26 | 57 | Parker | Sophia | F | Wife | M | Aug 31 | 1859 | 51 | ||
On line 26,
the value for the age
field is "51",
the suggested correction is "42". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The original data may indeed be wrong, but the transcription is true to the enumeration | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
26 | 57 | Parker | Sophia | F | Wife | M | Aug 31 | 1859 | 51 | ||
On line 26,
the value for the year
field is "1859",
the suggested correction is "1856". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
26 | 57 | Parker | Sophia | F | Wife | M | Aug 31 | 1859 | 51 | ||
On line 26,
the value for the day
field is "31",
the suggested correction is "13". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
27 | 57 | Parker | Theresa | F | Daughter | S | Feb 13 | 1856 | 45 | ||
On line 27,
the value for the day
field is "13",
the suggested correction is "17". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
27 | 57 | Parker | Theresa | F | Daughter | S | Feb 13 | 1856 | 45 | ||
On line 27,
the value for the month
field is "Feb",
the suggested correction is "Sep". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: There may be reasons to correct this, but the transcription reflects the enumerators input | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
27 | 57 | Parker | Theresa | F | Daughter | S | Feb 13 | 1856 | 45 | ||
On line 27,
the value for the age
field is "45",
the suggested correction is "22". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
27 | 57 | Parker | Theresa | F | Daughter | S | Feb 13 | 1856 | 45 | ||
On line 27,
the value for the year
field is "1856",
the suggested correction is "1879". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
28 | 57 | Parker | John | M | Son | S | Jun 11 | 1879 | 12 | ||
On line 28,
the value for the age
field is "12",
the suggested correction is "17".
The following comment was attached: although birth year and age do not match Census date, this age should be '17' | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
28 | 57 | Parker | John | M | Son | S | Jun 11 | 1879 | 12 | ||
On line 28,
the value for the age
field is "12",
the suggested correction is "17". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct. This comment was added: Given that the year matches an age of 12, it is imappropriate to change the age. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
28 | 57 | Parker | John | M | Son | S | Jun 11 | 1879 | 12 | ||
On line 28,
the value for the year
field is "1879",
the suggested correction is "1884". Submitted anonymously. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
30 | 57 | Gliddon | Thomas | M | ? | M | Mar 22 | 1887 | 50 | ||
On line 30, the value for the year field is "1887", the suggested correction is "1851". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
30 | 57 | Gliddon | Thomas | M | ? | M | Mar 22 | 1887 | 50 | ||
On line 30,
the value for the year
field is "1887",
the suggested correction is "1851". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: The census-taker makes the top of their "1" shorter than a "7". Also the second "8" looks more like a "5" and certainly not like the first "8". I believe it reads "1851". | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Tim McGinnis: The suggested change has been made This comment was added: Makes the math better also! | |||||||||||
Line 39: Researcher contact:
2nd cousin 2 times removed More |
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: g-1 District: ELGIN (East/Est) National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com