Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		53	Gordon Emily	F		Daughter	S	May 14	1883	17
2		53	Gordon Clara	F		Daughter	S	Aug 27	1890	10
3		54	Bissell Thomas	M		Head	M	Oct 18	1847	53
4		54	Bissell Mary	F		Wife	M	Jul 31	1858	42
5		54	Bissell Maggie	F		Daughter	S	May 21	1882	18
6		54	Bissell Alfred	M		Son	S	May 1	1886	14
7		55	Gordon William	M		Head	M	Apr 19	1872	28
8		55	Gordon Clara	F		Wife	M	Oct 28	1879	21
9		55	Gordon Harry	M		Son	S	Apr 12	1898	2
10		55	Gordon William	M		Son	S	Sep 11	1899	1
11
12		56	Niven Johnathan	M		Head	M	Jul 31	1838	62
13		56	Niven Belle	F		Wife	M	Jan 26	1861	40
14		56	Niven Ada	F		Daughter	S	Nov 1	1882	18
15		56	Niven Rhoda	F		Daughter	S	May 23	1884	16
16		56	Niven Annie	F		Daughter	S	Apr 26	1887	13
17		56	Niven Ruth	F		Daughter	S	Mar 11	1891	10
18		57	McCusker Frederick	M		Head	M	Jun 20	1878	22
19		57	McCusker Isabella	F		Wife	M	Jun 23	1878	22
20		58	Samson Jane	F		Head	W	Mar 17	1822	78
21		58	Samson Annie	F		Daughter	S	Mar 14	1855	45
22		58	Samson James	M		Son	S	Dec 10	1857	43
23		58	Samson John	M		Son	S	Jun 26	1863	37
24		58	Potts Frank	M		Boarder	S	Jun 8	1885	15	01
25		59	Servos Jacob	M		Head	M	Jul 31	1849	51
26		59	Servos Kathaline	F		Wife	M	Feb 7	1849	52
27		59	Servos Stella	F		Daughter	S	May 23	1879	21
28		59	Servos Katheline	F		Daughter	S	Apr 21	1881	19
29		59	Servos Effie	F		Daughter	S	Aug 23	1887	13	01
30		59	Servos Laduino	F		Daughter	S	Mar 31	1894	7
31		60	Overholt Lewis	M		Head	M	Jul 1	1881	19
32		60	Overholt Mary	F		Wife	M	Oct 8	1876	24
33		61	Osmond Rosina S.	M		Head	W	Sep 13	1842	58
34		61	James Rosa	F		Granddaughter	S	May 23	1890	10
35		61	James Alice	F		Daughter	W	May 12	1865	35
36		61	Osmond Mary	F		Daughter	S	Apr 17	1868	32
37		61	Hart Bernard	M		Hired Man	S	Apr 16	1880	20
38		61	Stevens Frederick	M		Grandson	S	May 8	1883	17
39		62	Thonger Charles	M		Head	W	May 7	1841	59
40		62	Ma??ollel Eliza A.	F		Housekeeper	W	May 18	1831	69
41		62	Corbett Thomas	M		Hiredman	S	Jul 15	1885	15
42		62	Gates William	M		Head	M	Jan 22	1852	48
43		62	Gates Ada	F		Wife	M	Oct 15	1859	41
44		62	Gates William	M		Son	S	Mar 12	1883	18
45		62	Gates Erdy	F		Daughter	S	May 18	1887	13
46		63	Little Thomas F.	M		Head	M	Sep 25	1858	42
47		63	Little Ella	F		Wife	M	Feb 20	1869	31
48		63	Little Francis	F		Daughter	S	May 22	1896	4
49		63	Little Eva	F		Daughter	S	Aug 6	1897	3
50		63	Little Thomas Sr.	M		Father	W	Jun 28	1818	82

Line Notes On This Page

The following note applies to line 2:

'ALL THE HOUSEHOLD NUMBERS ARE INCORRECT ON THIS PAGE'

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
1		53	Gordon	Emily	F		Daughter	S	May 14	1883	17
On line 1, the value for the household field is "53", the suggested correction is "56". The following comment was attached: household numbers do have meaning in that they are used to group households - and can't be reused in an enumeration district
Field Value Correction Note
1		53	Gordon	Emily	F		Daughter	S	May 14	1883	17
On line 1, the value for the household field is "53", the suggested correction is "56".
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: Please note Transcription Guidelines - The household numbers have no intrinsic meaning
Field Value Correction Note
2		53	Gordon	Clara	F		Daughter	S	Aug 27	1890	10
On line 2, the value for the household field is "53", the suggested correction is "56". The following comment was attached: rest of family is HH 56 on previous page
Field Value Correction Note
2		53	Gordon	Clara	F		Daughter	S	Aug 27	1890	10
On line 2, the value for the household field is "53", the suggested correction is "56".
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: Please note Transcription Guidelines - The household numbers have no intrinsic meaning
Field Value Correction Note
3		54	Bissell	Thomas	M		Head	M	Oct 18	1847	53
On line 3, the value for the household field is "54", the suggested correction is "57". The following comment was attached: household number has already been used on previous page - should be number from second column, not first
Field Value Correction Note
3		54	Bissell	Thomas	M		Head	M	Oct 18	1847	53
On line 3, the value for the household field is "54", the suggested correction is "57".
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.
Field Value Correction Note
3		54	Bissell	Thomas	M		Head	M	Oct 18	1847	53
On line 3, the value for the household field is "54", the suggested correction is "57". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Shld be 57
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number.
Field Value Correction Note
4		54	Bissell	Mary	F		Wife	M	Jul 31	1858	42
On line 4, the value for the household field is "54", the suggested correction is "57".
Field Value Correction Note
5		54	Bissell	Maggie	F		Daughter	S	May 21	1882	18
On line 5, the value for the household field is "54", the suggested correction is "57".
Field Value Correction Note
6		54	Bissell	Alfred	M		Son	S	May 1	1886	14
On line 6, the value for the household field is "54", the suggested correction is "57".
Field Value Correction Note
7		55	Gordon	William	M		Head	M	Apr 19	1872	28
On line 7, the value for the household field is "55", the suggested correction is "58". The following comment was attached: if you click on uncorrected household number you will see that two households are incorrectly grouped together
Field Value Correction Note
7		55	Gordon	William	M		Head	M	Apr 19	1872	28
On line 7, the value for the household field is "55", the suggested correction is "58". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Should be 58. Wrong household numbers throw the entire household off.
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number.
Field Value Correction Note
8		55	Gordon	Clara	F		Wife	M	Oct 28	1879	21
On line 8, the value for the household field is "55", the suggested correction is "58".
Field Value Correction Note
9		55	Gordon	Harry	M		Son	S	Apr 12	1898	2
On line 9, the value for the household field is "55", the suggested correction is "58".
Field Value Correction Note
10		55	Gordon	William	M		Son	S	Sep 11	1899	1
On line 10, the value for the household field is "55", the suggested correction is "58".
Field Value Correction Note
12		56	Niven	Johnathan	M		Head	M	Jul 31	1838	62
On line 12, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59".
Field Value Correction Note
12		56	Niven	Johnathan	M		Head	M	Jul 31	1838	62
On line 12, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: correct is 59
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number.
Field Value Correction Note
13		56	Niven	Belle	F		Wife	M	Jan 26	1861	40
On line 13, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59".
Field Value Correction Note
14		56	Niven	Ada	F		Daughter	S	Nov 1	1882	18
On line 14, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59".
Field Value Correction Note
15		56	Niven	Rhoda	F		Daughter	S	May 23	1884	16
On line 15, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59".
Field Value Correction Note
16		56	Niven	Annie	F		Daughter	S	Apr 26	1887	13
On line 16, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59".
Field Value Correction Note
17		56	Niven	Ruth	F		Daughter	S	Mar 11	1891	10
On line 17, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59".
Field Value Correction Note
18		57	McCusker	Frederick	M		Head	M	Jun 20	1878	22
On line 18, the value for the household field is "57", the suggested correction is "60". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: should be 60
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number.
Field Value Correction Note
18		57	McCusker	Frederick	M		Head	M	Jun 20	1878	22
On line 18, the value for the household field is "57", the suggested correction is "60".
Field Value Correction Note
19		57	McCusker	Isabella	F		Wife	M	Jun 23	1878	22
On line 19, the value for the household field is "57", the suggested correction is "60".
Field Value Correction Note
20		58	Samson	Jane	F		Head	W	Mar 17	1822	78
On line 20, the value for the household field is "58", the suggested correction is "61". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: should be 61
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number.
Field Value Correction Note
20		58	Samson	Jane	F		Head	W	Mar 17	1822	78
On line 20, the value for the household field is "58", the suggested correction is "61".
Field Value Correction Note
21		58	Samson	Annie	F		Daughter	S	Mar 14	1855	45
On line 21, the value for the household field is "58", the suggested correction is "61".
Field Value Correction Note
22		58	Samson	James	M		Son	S	Dec 10	1857	43
On line 22, the value for the household field is "58", the suggested correction is "61".
Field Value Correction Note
23		58	Samson	John	M		Son	S	Jun 26	1863	37
On line 23, the value for the household field is "58", the suggested correction is "61".
Field Value Correction Note
24		58	Potts	Frank	M		Boarder	S	Jun 8	1885	15
On line 24, the value for the household field is "58", the suggested correction is "61".
Field Value Correction Note
25		59	Servos	Jacob	M		Head	M	Jul 31	1849	51
On line 25, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: should be 62
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number.
Field Value Correction Note
25		59	Servos	Jacob	M		Head	M	Jul 31	1849	51
On line 25, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62".
Field Value Correction Note
26		59	Servos	Kathaline	F		Wife	M	Feb 7	1849	52
On line 26, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62".
Field Value Correction Note
27		59	Servos	Stella	F		Daughter	S	May 23	1879	21
On line 27, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62".
Field Value Correction Note
28		59	Servos	Katheline	F		Daughter	S	Apr 21	1881	19
On line 28, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62".
Field Value Correction Note
29		59	Servos	Effie	F		Daughter	S	Aug 23	1887	13
On line 29, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62".
Field Value Correction Note
30		59	Servos	Laduino	F		Daughter	S	Mar 31	1894	7
On line 30, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62".
Field Value Correction Note
31		60	Overholt	Lewis	M		Head	M	Jul 1	1881	19
On line 31, the value for the household field is "60", the suggested correction is "63".
Field Value Correction Note
31		60	Overholt	Lewis	M		Head	M	Jul 1	1881	19
On line 31, the value for the household field is "60", the suggested correction is "63". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: should be 63
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number.
Field Value Correction Note
32		60	Overholt	Mary	F		Wife	M	Oct 8	1876	24
On line 32, the value for the household field is "60", the suggested correction is "63".
Field Value Correction Note
33		61	Osmond	Rosina S.	M		Head	W	Sep 13	1842	58
On line 33, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Should be 64.
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number.
Field Value Correction Note
33		61	Osmond	Rosina S.	M		Head	W	Sep 13	1842	58
On line 33, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64".
Field Value Correction Note
34		61	James	Rosa	F		Granddaughter	S	May 23	1890	10
On line 34, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64".
Field Value Correction Note
35		61	James	Alice	F		Daughter	W	May 12	1865	35
On line 35, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64".
Field Value Correction Note
36		61	Osmond	Mary	F		Daughter	S	Apr 17	1868	32
On line 36, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64".
Field Value Correction Note
37		61	Hart	Bernard	M		Hired Man	S	Apr 16	1880	20
On line 37, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64".
Field Value Correction Note
38		61	Stevens	Frederick	M		Grandson	S	May 8	1883	17
On line 38, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64".
Field Value Correction Note
39		62	Thonger	Charles	M		Head	W	May 7	1841	59
On line 39, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "65".
Field Value Correction Note
39		62	Thonger	Charles	M		Head	W	May 7	1841	59
On line 39, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "65". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Shd be 65
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number.
Field Value Correction Note
40		62	Ma??ollel	Eliza A.	F		Housekeeper	W	May 18	1831	69
On line 40, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "65".
Field Value Correction Note
41		62	Corbett	Thomas	M		Hiredman	S	Jul 15	1885	15
On line 41, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "65".
Field Value Correction Note
42		62	Gates	William	M		Head	M	Jan 22	1852	48
On line 42, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "66". The following comment was attached: two families grouped together
Field Value Correction Note
42		62	Gates	William	M		Head	M	Jan 22	1852	48
On line 42, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "66". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Incorrect household number. shd be 66. These are all off on the page and are important to group households correctly.
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number.
Field Value Correction Note
43		62	Gates	Ada	F		Wife	M	Oct 15	1859	41
On line 43, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "66".
Field Value Correction Note
44		62	Gates	William	M		Son	S	Mar 12	1883	18
On line 44, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "66".
Field Value Correction Note
45		62	Gates	Erdy	F		Daughter	S	May 18	1887	13
On line 45, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "66".
Field Value Correction Note
46		63	Little	Thomas F.	M		Head	M	Sep 25	1858	42
On line 46, the value for the household field is "63", the suggested correction is "67". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: should be 67
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number.
Field Value Correction Note
46		63	Little	Thomas F.	M		Head	M	Sep 25	1858	42
On line 46, the value for the household field is "63", the suggested correction is "67".
Field Value Correction Note
47		63	Little	Ella	F		Wife	M	Feb 20	1869	31
On line 47, the value for the household field is "63", the suggested correction is "67".
Field Value Correction Note
48		63	Little	Francis	F		Daughter	S	May 22	1896	4
On line 48, the value for the household field is "63", the suggested correction is "67".
Field Value Correction Note
49		63	Little	Eva	F		Daughter	S	Aug 6	1897	3
On line 49, the value for the household field is "63", the suggested correction is "67".
Field Value Correction Note
50		63	Little	Thomas Sr.	M		Father	W	Jun 28	1818	82
On line 50, the value for the household field is "63", the suggested correction is "67".

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: g-4 District: LINCOLN & NIAGARA National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com