Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
|
|
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | Links | ||||||||||
H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 53 | Gordon Emily | F | Daughter | S | May 14 | 1883 |
|
|||||
2 | 53 | Gordon Clara | F | Daughter | S | Aug 27 | 1890 |
|
|||||
3 | 54 | Bissell Thomas | M | Head | M | Oct 18 | 1847 |
|
|||||
4 | 54 | Bissell Mary | F | Wife | M | Jul 31 | 1858 |
|
|||||
5 | 54 | Bissell Maggie | F | Daughter | S | May 21 | 1882 |
|
|||||
6 | 54 | Bissell Alfred | M | Son | S | May 1 | 1886 |
|
|||||
7 | 55 | Gordon William | M | Head | M | Apr 19 | 1872 |
|
|||||
8 | 55 | Gordon Clara | F | Wife | M | Oct 28 | 1879 |
|
|||||
9 | 55 | Gordon Harry | M | Son | S | Apr 12 | 1898 |
|
|||||
10 | 55 | Gordon William | M | Son | S | Sep 11 | 1899 |
|
|||||
11 |
|
||||||||||||
12 | 56 | Niven Johnathan | M | Head | M | Jul 31 | 1838 |
|
|||||
13 | 56 | Niven Belle | F | Wife | M | Jan 26 | 1861 |
|
|||||
14 | 56 | Niven Ada | F | Daughter | S | Nov 1 | 1882 |
|
|||||
15 | 56 | Niven Rhoda | F | Daughter | S | May 23 | 1884 |
|
|||||
16 | 56 | Niven Annie | F | Daughter | S | Apr 26 | 1887 |
|
|||||
17 | 56 | Niven Ruth | F | Daughter | S | Mar 11 | 1891 |
|
|||||
18 | 57 | McCusker Frederick | M | Head | M | Jun 20 | 1878 |
|
|||||
19 | 57 | McCusker Isabella | F | Wife | M | Jun 23 | 1878 |
|
|||||
20 | 58 | Samson Jane | F | Head | W | Mar 17 | 1822 |
|
|||||
21 | 58 | Samson Annie | F | Daughter | S | Mar 14 | 1855 |
|
|||||
22 | 58 | Samson James | M | Son | S | Dec 10 | 1857 |
|
|||||
23 | 58 | Samson John | M | Son | S | Jun 26 | 1863 |
|
|||||
24 | 58 | Potts Frank | M | Boarder | S | Jun 8 | 1885 |
|
01 | ||||
25 | 59 | Servos Jacob | M | Head | M | Jul 31 | 1849 |
|
|||||
26 | 59 | Servos Kathaline | F | Wife | M | Feb 7 | 1849 |
|
|||||
27 | 59 | Servos Stella | F | Daughter | S | May 23 | 1879 |
|
|||||
28 | 59 | Servos Katheline | F | Daughter | S | Apr 21 | 1881 |
|
|||||
29 | 59 | Servos Effie | F | Daughter | S | Aug 23 | 1887 |
|
01 | ||||
30 | 59 | Servos Laduino | F | Daughter | S | Mar 31 | 1894 |
|
|||||
31 | 60 | Overholt Lewis | M | Head | M | Jul 1 | 1881 |
|
|||||
32 | 60 | Overholt Mary | F | Wife | M | Oct 8 | 1876 |
|
|||||
33 | 61 | Osmond Rosina S. | M | Head | W | Sep 13 | 1842 |
|
|||||
34 | 61 | James Rosa | F | Granddaughter | S | May 23 | 1890 |
|
|||||
35 | 61 | James Alice | F | Daughter | W | May 12 | 1865 |
|
|||||
36 | 61 | Osmond Mary | F | Daughter | S | Apr 17 | 1868 |
|
|||||
37 | 61 | Hart Bernard | M | Hired Man | S | Apr 16 | 1880 |
|
|||||
38 | 61 | Stevens Frederick | M | Grandson | S | May 8 | 1883 |
|
|||||
39 | 62 | Thonger Charles | M | Head | W | May 7 | 1841 |
|
|||||
40 | 62 | Ma??ollel Eliza A. | F | Housekeeper | W | May 18 | 1831 |
|
|||||
41 | 62 | Corbett Thomas | M | Hiredman | S | Jul 15 | 1885 |
|
|||||
42 | 62 | Gates William | M | Head | M | Jan 22 | 1852 |
|
|||||
43 | 62 | Gates Ada | F | Wife | M | Oct 15 | 1859 |
|
|||||
44 | 62 | Gates William | M | Son | S | Mar 12 | 1883 |
|
|||||
45 | 62 | Gates Erdy | F | Daughter | S | May 18 | 1887 |
|
|||||
46 | 63 | Little Thomas F. | M | Head | M | Sep 25 | 1858 |
|
|||||
47 | 63 | Little Ella | F | Wife | M | Feb 20 | 1869 |
|
|||||
48 | 63 | Little Francis | F | Daughter | S | May 22 | 1896 |
|
|||||
49 | 63 | Little Eva | F | Daughter | S | Aug 6 | 1897 |
|
|||||
50 | 63 | Little Thomas Sr. | M | Father | W | Jun 28 | 1818 |
|
The following note applies to line 2:
'ALL THE HOUSEHOLD NUMBERS ARE INCORRECT ON THIS PAGE' |
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
1 | 53 | Gordon | Emily | F | Daughter | S | May 14 | 1883 | 17 | ||
On line 1,
the value for the household
field is "53",
the suggested correction is "56".
The following comment was attached: household numbers do have meaning in that they are used to group households - and can't be reused in an enumeration district | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
1 | 53 | Gordon | Emily | F | Daughter | S | May 14 | 1883 | 17 | ||
On line 1, the value for the household field is "53", the suggested correction is "56". | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: Please note Transcription Guidelines - The household numbers have no intrinsic meaning | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
2 | 53 | Gordon | Clara | F | Daughter | S | Aug 27 | 1890 | 10 | ||
On line 2,
the value for the household
field is "53",
the suggested correction is "56".
The following comment was attached: rest of family is HH 56 on previous page | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
2 | 53 | Gordon | Clara | F | Daughter | S | Aug 27 | 1890 | 10 | ||
On line 2, the value for the household field is "53", the suggested correction is "56". | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: Please note Transcription Guidelines - The household numbers have no intrinsic meaning | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
3 | 54 | Bissell | Thomas | M | Head | M | Oct 18 | 1847 | 53 | ||
On line 3,
the value for the household
field is "54",
the suggested correction is "57".
The following comment was attached: household number has already been used on previous page - should be number from second column, not first | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
3 | 54 | Bissell | Thomas | M | Head | M | Oct 18 | 1847 | 53 | ||
On line 3, the value for the household field is "54", the suggested correction is "57". | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
3 | 54 | Bissell | Thomas | M | Head | M | Oct 18 | 1847 | 53 | ||
On line 3,
the value for the household
field is "54",
the suggested correction is "57". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Shld be 57 | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
4 | 54 | Bissell | Mary | F | Wife | M | Jul 31 | 1858 | 42 | ||
On line 4, the value for the household field is "54", the suggested correction is "57". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
5 | 54 | Bissell | Maggie | F | Daughter | S | May 21 | 1882 | 18 | ||
On line 5, the value for the household field is "54", the suggested correction is "57". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
6 | 54 | Bissell | Alfred | M | Son | S | May 1 | 1886 | 14 | ||
On line 6, the value for the household field is "54", the suggested correction is "57". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
7 | 55 | Gordon | William | M | Head | M | Apr 19 | 1872 | 28 | ||
On line 7,
the value for the household
field is "55",
the suggested correction is "58".
The following comment was attached: if you click on uncorrected household number you will see that two households are incorrectly grouped together | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
7 | 55 | Gordon | William | M | Head | M | Apr 19 | 1872 | 28 | ||
On line 7,
the value for the household
field is "55",
the suggested correction is "58". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Should be 58. Wrong household numbers throw the entire household off. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
8 | 55 | Gordon | Clara | F | Wife | M | Oct 28 | 1879 | 21 | ||
On line 8, the value for the household field is "55", the suggested correction is "58". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
9 | 55 | Gordon | Harry | M | Son | S | Apr 12 | 1898 | 2 | ||
On line 9, the value for the household field is "55", the suggested correction is "58". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
10 | 55 | Gordon | William | M | Son | S | Sep 11 | 1899 | 1 | ||
On line 10, the value for the household field is "55", the suggested correction is "58". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
12 | 56 | Niven | Johnathan | M | Head | M | Jul 31 | 1838 | 62 | ||
On line 12, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
12 | 56 | Niven | Johnathan | M | Head | M | Jul 31 | 1838 | 62 | ||
On line 12,
the value for the household
field is "56",
the suggested correction is "59". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: correct is 59 | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
13 | 56 | Niven | Belle | F | Wife | M | Jan 26 | 1861 | 40 | ||
On line 13, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
14 | 56 | Niven | Ada | F | Daughter | S | Nov 1 | 1882 | 18 | ||
On line 14, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
15 | 56 | Niven | Rhoda | F | Daughter | S | May 23 | 1884 | 16 | ||
On line 15, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
16 | 56 | Niven | Annie | F | Daughter | S | Apr 26 | 1887 | 13 | ||
On line 16, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
17 | 56 | Niven | Ruth | F | Daughter | S | Mar 11 | 1891 | 10 | ||
On line 17, the value for the household field is "56", the suggested correction is "59". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
18 | 57 | McCusker | Frederick | M | Head | M | Jun 20 | 1878 | 22 | ||
On line 18,
the value for the household
field is "57",
the suggested correction is "60". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: should be 60 | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
18 | 57 | McCusker | Frederick | M | Head | M | Jun 20 | 1878 | 22 | ||
On line 18, the value for the household field is "57", the suggested correction is "60". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
19 | 57 | McCusker | Isabella | F | Wife | M | Jun 23 | 1878 | 22 | ||
On line 19, the value for the household field is "57", the suggested correction is "60". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
20 | 58 | Samson | Jane | F | Head | W | Mar 17 | 1822 | 78 | ||
On line 20,
the value for the household
field is "58",
the suggested correction is "61". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: should be 61 | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
20 | 58 | Samson | Jane | F | Head | W | Mar 17 | 1822 | 78 | ||
On line 20, the value for the household field is "58", the suggested correction is "61". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
21 | 58 | Samson | Annie | F | Daughter | S | Mar 14 | 1855 | 45 | ||
On line 21, the value for the household field is "58", the suggested correction is "61". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
22 | 58 | Samson | James | M | Son | S | Dec 10 | 1857 | 43 | ||
On line 22, the value for the household field is "58", the suggested correction is "61". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
23 | 58 | Samson | John | M | Son | S | Jun 26 | 1863 | 37 | ||
On line 23, the value for the household field is "58", the suggested correction is "61". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
24 | 58 | Potts | Frank | M | Boarder | S | Jun 8 | 1885 | 15 | ||
On line 24, the value for the household field is "58", the suggested correction is "61". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
25 | 59 | Servos | Jacob | M | Head | M | Jul 31 | 1849 | 51 | ||
On line 25,
the value for the household
field is "59",
the suggested correction is "62". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: should be 62 | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
25 | 59 | Servos | Jacob | M | Head | M | Jul 31 | 1849 | 51 | ||
On line 25, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
26 | 59 | Servos | Kathaline | F | Wife | M | Feb 7 | 1849 | 52 | ||
On line 26, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
27 | 59 | Servos | Stella | F | Daughter | S | May 23 | 1879 | 21 | ||
On line 27, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
28 | 59 | Servos | Katheline | F | Daughter | S | Apr 21 | 1881 | 19 | ||
On line 28, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
29 | 59 | Servos | Effie | F | Daughter | S | Aug 23 | 1887 | 13 | ||
On line 29, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
30 | 59 | Servos | Laduino | F | Daughter | S | Mar 31 | 1894 | 7 | ||
On line 30, the value for the household field is "59", the suggested correction is "62". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
31 | 60 | Overholt | Lewis | M | Head | M | Jul 1 | 1881 | 19 | ||
On line 31, the value for the household field is "60", the suggested correction is "63". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
31 | 60 | Overholt | Lewis | M | Head | M | Jul 1 | 1881 | 19 | ||
On line 31,
the value for the household
field is "60",
the suggested correction is "63". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: should be 63 | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
32 | 60 | Overholt | Mary | F | Wife | M | Oct 8 | 1876 | 24 | ||
On line 32, the value for the household field is "60", the suggested correction is "63". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
33 | 61 | Osmond | Rosina S. | M | Head | W | Sep 13 | 1842 | 58 | ||
On line 33,
the value for the household
field is "61",
the suggested correction is "64". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Should be 64. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
33 | 61 | Osmond | Rosina S. | M | Head | W | Sep 13 | 1842 | 58 | ||
On line 33, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
34 | 61 | James | Rosa | F | Granddaughter | S | May 23 | 1890 | 10 | ||
On line 34, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
35 | 61 | James | Alice | F | Daughter | W | May 12 | 1865 | 35 | ||
On line 35, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
36 | 61 | Osmond | Mary | F | Daughter | S | Apr 17 | 1868 | 32 | ||
On line 36, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
37 | 61 | Hart | Bernard | M | Hired Man | S | Apr 16 | 1880 | 20 | ||
On line 37, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
38 | 61 | Stevens | Frederick | M | Grandson | S | May 8 | 1883 | 17 | ||
On line 38, the value for the household field is "61", the suggested correction is "64". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
39 | 62 | Thonger | Charles | M | Head | W | May 7 | 1841 | 59 | ||
On line 39, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "65". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
39 | 62 | Thonger | Charles | M | Head | W | May 7 | 1841 | 59 | ||
On line 39,
the value for the household
field is "62",
the suggested correction is "65". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Shd be 65 | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
40 | 62 | Ma??ollel | Eliza A. | F | Housekeeper | W | May 18 | 1831 | 69 | ||
On line 40, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "65". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
41 | 62 | Corbett | Thomas | M | Hiredman | S | Jul 15 | 1885 | 15 | ||
On line 41, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "65". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
42 | 62 | Gates | William | M | Head | M | Jan 22 | 1852 | 48 | ||
On line 42,
the value for the household
field is "62",
the suggested correction is "66".
The following comment was attached: two families grouped together | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
42 | 62 | Gates | William | M | Head | M | Jan 22 | 1852 | 48 | ||
On line 42,
the value for the household
field is "62",
the suggested correction is "66". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Incorrect household number. shd be 66. These are all off on the page and are important to group households correctly. | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
43 | 62 | Gates | Ada | F | Wife | M | Oct 15 | 1859 | 41 | ||
On line 43, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "66". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
44 | 62 | Gates | William | M | Son | S | Mar 12 | 1883 | 18 | ||
On line 44, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "66". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
45 | 62 | Gates | Erdy | F | Daughter | S | May 18 | 1887 | 13 | ||
On line 45, the value for the household field is "62", the suggested correction is "66". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
46 | 63 | Little | Thomas F. | M | Head | M | Sep 25 | 1858 | 42 | ||
On line 46,
the value for the household
field is "63",
the suggested correction is "67". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: should be 67 | |||||||||||
This correction was evaluated by Peggy Wessel: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original. This comment was added: The importance of the household number in our index is in grouping people into households, so what the number is is less important than that all the members of a given household have the same number. | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
46 | 63 | Little | Thomas F. | M | Head | M | Sep 25 | 1858 | 42 | ||
On line 46, the value for the household field is "63", the suggested correction is "67". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
47 | 63 | Little | Ella | F | Wife | M | Feb 20 | 1869 | 31 | ||
On line 47, the value for the household field is "63", the suggested correction is "67". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
48 | 63 | Little | Francis | F | Daughter | S | May 22 | 1896 | 4 | ||
On line 48, the value for the household field is "63", the suggested correction is "67". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
49 | 63 | Little | Eva | F | Daughter | S | Aug 6 | 1897 | 3 | ||
On line 49, the value for the household field is "63", the suggested correction is "67". | |||||||||||
Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
50 | 63 | Little | Thomas Sr. | M | Father | W | Jun 28 | 1818 | 82 | ||
On line 50, the value for the household field is "63", the suggested correction is "67". | |||||||||||
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: g-4 District: LINCOLN & NIAGARA National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com