Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
-> If you find a transcription error on this page please use the proof page to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.

L i n e   #	Numbered in order of visitation		Personal Description								Links
	H o u s e	Family or House- hold	Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901.	Sex.	C o l o u r	Relationship to head of family or household.	Single, married, widowed or divorced.	Month and date of birth.	Year of birth.	Age at last birthday.
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
1		68	Stewart Winifred	F		Daughter	S	Dec 2	1880	20
2		68	Stewart Howard	M		Son	S	Apr 5	1885	16
3		69	Drew James P	M		Head	M	Mar 8	1856	45
4		69	Drew Josephine	F		Wife	M	Dec 9	1866	34
5		69	Drew James P	M		Son	S	Jun 25	1895	5
6		69	Drew Daniel B	M		Son	S	Oct 8	1896	4
7		69	Drew Dorothy E J	F		Daughter	S	Jul 20	1899	1
8		70	Ostic W D	M		Head	S	Jun 1	1851	49
9		70	Ostic W J	F		Wife	M	Oct 3	1859	41
10		70	Ostic Leon M	F		Daughter	S	Aug 5	1883	17
11		70	Ostic W Clark	M		Son	S	Dec 29	1887	13
12		70	Golden Nelly	F		Domestic	S	Dec 10	1881	19
13		70	Bidenhamer F B	M		Boarder	S	Nov 20	1870	30
14		71	Stalky Malcolm	M		Head	M	Sep 3	1853	47	01
15		71	Stalky Margerite	F		Wife	M	Feb 25	1855	44	01
16		71	Stalky H Isabella	F		Daughter	S	Feb 20	1882	19	01
17		71	Stalky Douglas	M		Son	S	Feb 18	1884	17
18		71	Stalky Berkeley	M		Son	S	Jun 10	1886	15	01
19		71	Stalky Margurite	F		Daughter	S	Sep 18	1890	10	01
20		71	Stalky Malcom	M		Son	S	Aug 28	1895	5	01
21		71	Dunn Cory	F		Domestic	S	Jul 10	1880	21
22		72	Harris Marthe	F		Head	W	Apr 19	1828	72
23		72	Harris Charles Franklin	M		Son	S	Mar 24	1855	46	01
24		73	Pillon Thomas	M		Head	M	May 10	1836	64
25		73	Pillon Ellen	F		Wife	M	Feb 17	1842	57
26		74	Goodcall Thomas	M		Head	M	May 17	1847	53
27		74	Goodcall Agnes	F		Wife	M	Sep 26	1855	45
28		74	Goodcall Joan	M		Son	S	Nov 17	1886	14
29		74	Goodcall Sara Ann	F		Daughter	S	Feb 5	1889	11
30		74	Goodcall James B	M		Son	S	May 19	1892	8
31		74	Goodcall Soretto	M		Son	S	Oct 19	1894	6
32		75	Lemly John	M		Head	M	Aug 23	1877	27
33		75	Lemly Kelly	F		Wife	M	Mar 7	1878	23	01
34		75	Lemly Oswald	M		Son	S	Nov 4	1899	2	01
35		76	Pillon John	M		Head	M	Mar 22	1863	36
36		76	Billow Alorine	F		Wife	M	Sep 11	1865	34
37		76	Pillon Ariesmea	F		Daughter	S	Jan 6	1893	8
38		76	Pillon Malinda	F		Daughter	S	Jul 13	1895	6
39		76	Love David	M		Boarder	S	Mar 10	1879	22
40		76	Love William	M		Boarder	S	Jun 10	1878	23
41		76	McWhimery Wm	M		Boarder	S	Sep 15	1867	36
42		76	Lloyd Wallis	M		Boarder	S	Apr 24	1880	21
43		76	Hawthorne R J	M		Boarder	M	Aug 31	1869	31	01
44		76	Hawthorne Alice	F		Boarder	M	Aug 24	1869	31	01
45		76	Kaake Barbara	F		Boarder	S	Jan 15	1879	22
46		76	Malcolm Ella	F		Boarder	S	Mar 24	1868	23
47		77	McKay Sarah J	F		Head	W	Oct 17	1857	44
48		77	McKay Ida	F		Daughter	S	Dec 19	1881	19
49		78	Richardson Robert	M		Head	M	Oct 25	1847	47
50		79	Richardson Christian	F		Wife	M	Oct 20	1851	50

Field Correction Notes on this page

Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.

Field Value Correction Note
7		69	Drew	Dorothy E J	F		Daughter	S	Jul 20	1899	1
On line 7, the value for the givens field is "Dorothy", the suggested correction is "Dorothy E.J.".
This correction was evaluated by Ted Larson: The suggested change has been made
Field Value Correction Note
10		70	Ostic	Leon M	F		Daughter	S	Aug 5	1883	17
On line 10, the value for the givens field is "Leon M", the suggested correction is "??on M".
This correction was evaluated by Ted Larson: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
10		70	Ostic	Leon M	F		Daughter	S	Aug 5	1883	17
On line 10, the value for the givens field is "Leon W", the suggested correction is "Cora M". Submitted anonymously. The following comment was attached: Her name was Cora May
This correction was evaluated by Ted Larson: A change other than the suggested correction has been made, I have checked the image of the original form and agree with the current value
Field Value Correction Note
21		71	Dunn	Cory	F		Domestic	S	Jul 10	1880	21
On line 21, the value for the month field is "Jul", the suggested correction is "?".
This correction was evaluated by Ted Larson: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
26		74	Goodcall	Thomas	M		Head	M	May 17	1847	53
On line 26, the value for the surname field is "Goodcall", the suggested correction is "Goodcock". The following comment was attached: Suggest compare to "ll" in "Ellen" line above and "ll" in "Isabella" line 15
This correction was evaluated by Ted Larson: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
28		74	Goodcall	Joan	M		Son	S	Nov 17	1886	14
On line 28, the value for the givens field is "James", the suggested correction is "John". The following comment was attached: Suggest does not compare to another son's given "James Brown?" line 30
This correction was evaluated by Ted Larson: A change other than the suggested correction has been made, I have checked the image of the original form and agree with the current value
Field Value Correction Note
33		75	Lemly	Kelly	F		Wife	M	Mar 7	1878	23
On line 33, the value for the givens field is "Kelly", the suggested correction is "Tilly".
This correction was evaluated by Ted Larson: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
41		76	McWhimery	Wm	M		Boarder	S	Sep 15	1867	36
On line 41, the value for the lineNo field is "41", the suggested correction is "41*". The following comment was attached: Above this line indication of line to be entered below line 40: "McQuay?, Bella", "F", "S", "Boarder"; no birth date or age indicated
This correction was evaluated by Ted Larson: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
42		76	Lloyd	Wallis	M		Boarder	S	Apr 24	1880	21
On line 42, the value for the givens field is "Wallis", the suggested correction is "Walter".
This correction was evaluated by Ted Larson: I have checked the image of the original form and the correct value is debatable but I think the transcribed value is more likely to be correct.
Field Value Correction Note
45		76	Kaake	Barbara	F		Boarder	S	Jan 15	1879	22
On line 45, the value for the surname field is "Kaake", the suggested correction is "Koake".
This correction was evaluated by Ted Larson: I have checked the image of the original form and am very sure that the suggested correction does not reflect the original.

To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.

Go to: Subdistrict Number: f-2 District: BRUCE (East/Est) National: Canada.

Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census

All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com