| Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
@ next to the line number indicates contact information for someone
researching this person, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
| L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | Links | ||||||||||
| H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Stella | F | Daughter | S | Dec 17 | 1887 |
|
Links | |||||
2 |
Anna | F | Daughter | S | Apr 3 | 1893 |
|
Links | |||||
3 |
Mary | F | Sister | S | Mar 23 | 1841 |
|
||||||
4 |
Walter | M | Brother | S | Jan 23 | 1847 |
|
||||||
| 5 | 10 | Lacy James | M | Head | S | Mar 28 | 1848 |
|
|||||
6 |
Lacy Catherine | F | Sister | S | Nov 7 | 1853 |
|
||||||
| 7 | 11 | McMullen Robt | M | Head | M | Oct 20 | 1821 |
|
|||||
8 |
McMullen Isabella | F | Wife | M | Jul 10 | 1840 |
|
||||||
9 |
McMullen Jane | F | Daughter | S | Feb 8 | 1871 |
|
||||||
10 |
McMullen Robert J. | M | Son | S | Mar 25 | 1872 |
|
||||||
| 11 | 12 | Cassidy William | M | Head | M | Jun 16 | 1862 |
|
|||||
12 |
Cassidy Ellen | F | Wife | M | Jul 22 | 1869 |
|
||||||
13 |
Cassidy Mary A. | F | Daughter | S | Nov 5 | 1896 |
|
||||||
14 |
Cassidy Francis | M | Son | S | Jan 28 | 1898 |
|
||||||
15 |
Cassidy William P. | M | Son | S | Jan 29 | 1899 |
|
||||||
16 |
Cassidy Joseph L. | M | Son | S | Jul 13 | 1900 |
|
||||||
| 17 | 13 | Rodgers William | M | Head | M | Nov 3 | 1858 |
|
Links | ||||
18 |
Rodgers Sarah | F | Wife | M | Dec 27 | 1858 |
|
Links | |||||
19 |
Rodgers Sarah E. | F | Daughter | S | Jul 27 | 1887 |
|
Links | |||||
20 |
Rodgers William D. | M | Son | S | Apr 23 | 1889 |
|
||||||
21 |
Rodgers John T. | M | Son | S | Jan 3 | 1891 |
|
Links | |||||
22 |
Rodgers Emma J. | F | Daughter | S | Apr 19 | 1892 |
|
||||||
23 |
Rodgers Herbert S. | M | Son | S | Dec 19 | 1893 |
|
Links | |||||
24 |
Rodgers Anna M. | F | Daughter | S | Aug 19 | 1895 |
|
Links | |||||
25 |
Rodgers Rachael A. | F | Daughter | S | Nov 26 | 1897 |
|
Links | |||||
26 |
Rodgers Smithey | M | Son | S | Feb 3 | 1900 |
|
Links | |||||
| 27 | 14 | Rodgers Jas. | M | Head | M | Nov 1 | 1852 |
|
|||||
28 |
Rodgers Jennet | F | Wife | M | Mar 27 | 1852 |
|
Links | |||||
29 |
Rodgers Margaret J. | F | Daughter | S | Jul 30 | 1879 |
|
||||||
30 |
Rodgers Mary | F | Daughter | S | Jan 10 | 1880 |
|
||||||
31 |
Rodgers James | M | Son | S | Nov 28 | 1882 |
|
Links | |||||
32 |
Rodgers Daniel J. | M | Son | S | Jul 28 | 1889 |
|
Links | |||||
33 |
Rodgers Jennett | F | Daughter | S | Jun 15 | 1893 |
|
Links | |||||
| 34 | 15 | York Reuben | M | Head | M | Feb 5 | 1865 |
|
Links | ||||
35 |
York Annie | F | Wife | M | Jul 26 | 1872 |
|
Links | |||||
36 |
York William J. | M | Son | S | Sep 15 | 1894 |
|
Links | |||||
37 |
York Mable | F | Daughter | S | Feb 23 | 1896 |
|
Links | |||||
38 |
York Jesse F. | M | Son | S | Aug 13 | 1898 |
|
Links | |||||
39 |
York Edmund | M | Son | S | Aug 28 | 1900 |
|
Links | |||||
| 40 | 16 | Shannon Sam | M | Head | M | Nov 1 | 1834 |
|
Links | ||||
@ 41 |
Shannon Mary J. | F | Wife | M | Jan 25 | 1842 |
|
Links | |||||
42 |
Shannon Hatty P. | F | Daughter | S | Dec 19 | 1886 |
|
||||||
43 |
Shannon William | M | Son | M | Oct 6 | 1865 |
|
Links | |||||
44 |
Shannon Mary J | F | Daughter-inlaw | M | Feb 28 | 1872 |
|
Links | |||||
45 |
Shannon Anna B. | F | Daughter | S | Feb 5 | 1895 |
|
Links | |||||
46 |
Shannon Herbert F. | M | Son | S | Sep 21 | 1897 |
|
Links | |||||
47 |
Shannon Ada P. | F | Daughter | S | Dec 20 | 1898 |
|
Links | |||||
48 |
Shannon Hasel S. | F | Daughter | S | Apr 18 | 1900 |
|
Links | |||||
49 |
17 | Athus John | M | Head | M | Oct 5 | 1844 |
|
|||||
50 |
Athus Rosey | F | Wife | M | Aug 2 | 1840 |
|
||||||
In household 17, the enumerator wrote the surname as 'Athus',
a suggested alternative surname is 'Arthur'.
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 1 | Stella | F | Daughter | S | Dec 17 | 1887 | 13 | ||||
On line 1,
the value for the surname
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Way". Submitted by Margaret Cox. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 1 | Stella | F | Daughter | S | Dec 17 | 1887 | 13 | ||||
On line 1,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "9". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: This family is continued from page one. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 2 | Anna | F | Daughter | S | Apr 3 | 1893 | 7 | ||||
On line 2,
the value for the surname
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Way". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: Surname also applies to lines 3 & 4. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 2 | Anna | F | Daughter | S | Apr 3 | 1893 | 7 | ||||
On line 2,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "9". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: This is household "9". Correction also applies to lines 3 & 4. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 3 | Mary | F | Sister | S | Mar 23 | 1841 | 59 | ||||
On line 3,
the value for the surname
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Way".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 3 | Mary | F | Sister | S | Mar 23 | 1841 | 59 | ||||
On line 3,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "9".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 4 | Walter | M | Brother | S | Jan 23 | 1847 | 53 | ||||
On line 4,
the value for the surname
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "Way".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 4 | Walter | M | Brother | S | Jan 23 | 1847 | 53 | ||||
On line 4,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "9".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 6 | Lacy | Catherine | F | Sister | S | Nov 7 | 1853 | 47 | |||
On line 6,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "10". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: Household number should be entered on each/every line. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 6 | Lacy | Catherine | F | Sister | S | Nov 7 | 1853 | 47 | |||
On line 6,
the value for the givens
field is "Catherine",
the suggested correction is "Catharine". Submitted by Margaret Cox. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 8 | McMullen | Isabella | F | Wife | M | Jul 10 | 1840 | 60 | |||
On line 8,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "11". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: Household number "11" also applies to lines 9 & 10. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 9 | McMullen | Jane | F | Daughter | S | Feb 8 | 1871 | 29 | |||
On line 9,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "11".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 10 | McMullen | Robert J. | M | Son | S | Mar 25 | 1872 | 28 | |||
On line 10,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "11".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 12 | Cassidy | Ellen | F | Wife | M | Jul 22 | 1869 | 31 | |||
On line 12,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "12". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: Household number "12" also applies to lines 14 thru 16. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 13 | Cassidy | Mary A. | F | Daughter | S | Nov 5 | 1896 | 4 | |||
On line 13,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "12".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 14 | Cassidy | Francis | M | Son | S | Jan 28 | 1898 | 3 | |||
On line 14,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "12".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 15 | Cassidy | William P. | M | Son | S | Jan 29 | 1899 | 2 | |||
On line 15,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "12".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 16 | Cassidy | Joseph L. | M | Son | S | Jul 13 | 1900 | ||||
On line 16,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "12".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 16 | Cassidy | Joseph L. | M | Son | S | Jul 13 | 1900 | ||||
On line 16,
the value for the age
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "under 1". Submitted by Margaret Cox. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 18 | Rodgers | Sarah | F | Wife | M | Dec 27 | 1858 | 42 | |||
On line 18,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "13". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: Household number "13" also applies to lines 19 thru 26. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 19 | Rodgers | Sarah E. | F | Daughter | S | Jul 27 | 1887 | 13 | |||
On line 19,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "13".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 20 | Rodgers | William D. | M | Son | S | Apr 23 | 1889 | 11 | |||
On line 20,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "13".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 21 | Rodgers | John T. | M | Son | S | Jan 3 | 1891 | 10 | |||
On line 21,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "13".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 22 | Rodgers | Emma J. | F | Daughter | S | Apr 19 | 1892 | 8 | |||
On line 22,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "13".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 23 | Rodgers | Herbert S. | M | Son | S | Dec 19 | 1893 | 7 | |||
On line 23,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "13".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 24 | Rodgers | Anna M. | F | Daughter | S | Aug 19 | 1895 | 5 | |||
On line 24,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "13".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 25 | Rodgers | Rachael A. | F | Daughter | S | Nov 26 | 1897 | 3 | |||
On line 25,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "13".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 26 | Rodgers | Smithey | M | Son | S | Feb 3 | 1900 | 1 | |||
On line 26,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "13".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 28 | Rodgers | Jennet | F | Wife | M | Mar 27 | 1852 | 48 | |||
On line 28,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "14". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: Household number "14" also applies to lines 29 thru 33. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 29 | Rodgers | Margaret J. | F | Daughter | S | Jul 30 | 1879 | 21 | |||
On line 29,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "14".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 30 | Rodgers | Mary | F | Daughter | S | Jan 10 | 1880 | 20 | |||
On line 30,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "14".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 31 | Rodgers | James | M | Son | S | Nov 28 | 1882 | 18 | |||
On line 31,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "14".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 32 | Rodgers | Daniel J. | M | Son | S | Jul 28 | 1889 | 11 | |||
On line 32,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "14".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 33 | Rodgers | Jennett | F | Daughter | S | Jun 15 | 1893 | 7 | |||
On line 33,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "14".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 35 | York | Annie | F | Wife | M | Jul 26 | 1872 | 29 | |||
On line 35,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "15". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: Household number "15" also applies to lines 36 thru 39. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 36 | York | William J. | M | Son | S | Sep 15 | 1894 | 7 | |||
On line 36,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "15".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 37 | York | Mable | F | Daughter | S | Feb 23 | 1896 | 5 | |||
On line 37,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "15".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 38 | York | Jesse F. | M | Son | S | Aug 13 | 1898 | 3 | |||
On line 38,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "15".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 39 | York | Edmund | M | Son | S | Aug 28 | 1900 | ||||
On line 39,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "15".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 39 | York | Edmund | M | Son | S | Aug 28 | 1900 | ||||
On line 39,
the value for the age
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "under 1". Submitted by Margaret Cox. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 41 | Shannon | Mary J. | F | Wife | M | Jan 25 | 1842 | 58 | |||
On line 41,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "16". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: Household number "16" also applies to lines 42 thru 48. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 42 | Shannon | Hatty P. | F | Daughter | S | Dec 19 | 1886 | 14 | |||
On line 42,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "16".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 43 | Shannon | William | M | Son | M | Oct 6 | 1865 | 35 | |||
On line 43,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "16".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 44 | Shannon | Mary J | F | Daughter-inlaw | M | Feb 28 | 1872 | 28 | |||
On line 44,
the value for the otherRelationship
field is "Daughter-inlaw",
the suggested correction is "Daughter-in-law".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 44 | Shannon | Mary J | F | Daughter-inlaw | M | Feb 28 | 1872 | 28 | |||
On line 44,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "16".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 45 | Shannon | Anna B. | F | Daughter | S | Feb 5 | 1895 | 5 | |||
On line 45,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "16".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 45 | Shannon | Anna B. | F | Daughter | S | Feb 5 | 1895 | 5 | |||
On line 45,
the value for the relationship
field is "Daughter",
the suggested correction is "Granddaughter". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: "Gr" was inserted in front of "Daughter", making it "Gr. daughter". | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 46 | Shannon | Herbert F. | M | Son | S | Sep 21 | 1897 | 3 | |||
On line 46,
the value for the relationship
field is "Son",
the suggested correction is "Grandson". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: The "Gr" in front of "Son" makes it "Grandson". | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 46 | Shannon | Herbert F. | M | Son | S | Sep 21 | 1897 | 3 | |||
On line 46,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "16".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 47 | Shannon | Ada P. | F | Daughter | S | Dec 20 | 1898 | 2 | |||
On line 47,
the value for the relationship
field is "Daughter",
the suggested correction is "Granddaughter". Submitted by Margaret Cox. The following comment was attached: Same as line 45. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 47 | Shannon | Ada P. | F | Daughter | S | Dec 20 | 1898 | 2 | |||
On line 47,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "16".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 48 | Shannon | Hasel S. | F | Daughter | S | Apr 18 | 1900 | ||||
On line 48,
the value for the age
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "under 1". Submitted by Margaret Cox. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 48 | Shannon | Hasel S. | F | Daughter | S | Apr 18 | 1900 | ||||
On line 48,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "16".
| |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 48 | Shannon | Hasel S. | F | Daughter | S | Apr 18 | 1900 | ||||
On line 48,
the value for the relationship
field is "Daughter",
the suggested correction is "Granddaughter". Submitted by Margaret Cox. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 50 | Athus | Rosey | F | Wife | M | Aug 2 | 1840 | 60 | |||
On line 50,
the value for the household
field is "[ ]",
the suggested correction is "17". Submitted by Margaret Cox. | |||||||||||
| Line 41: Researcher contact:
I think this is Mary Jane Loucks, she would be a distant relative of mine. More |
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: o-4 District: ADDINGTON National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com