| Site Home Linking Message Boards Help | Automated Genealogy | Census Indices: 1901 1906 1911 1852CA 1851NB |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Note: this index is only a partial transcription of the original form, see the image for the complete census data.
indicates a note applies to this line, see the bottom of the page.
If you find a transcription error on this page please use the
proof page
to verify the error is in the transcription and not the original, and to report it.
| L i n e # |
Numbered in order of visitation | Personal Description | Links | ||||||||||
| H o u s e |
Family or House- hold |
Name of each person in family or household on 31st March, 1901. | Sex. | C o l o u r |
Relationship to head of family or household. |
Single, married, widowed or divorced. |
Month and date of birth. | Year of birth. | Age at last birthday. | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
27 | Cicere Hergal | M | Head | M | Oct 18 | 1844 |
|
Links | ||||
2 |
27 | Cicere Minnie | F | Wife | M | Mar 25 | 1855 |
|
|||||
3 |
27 | Cicere Elego? | M | Son | S | Dec 1 | 1881 |
|
|||||
4 |
27 | Cicere Clara | F | Son | S | Feb 6 | 1884 |
|
|||||
| 5 | 27 | Cicere William | M | Son | S | Nov 29 | 1888 |
|
|||||
| 6 | 27 | Cicere Henry | M | Son | S | Jun 3 | 1891 |
|
|||||
7 |
27 | Cicere Floss | F | Daughter | S | Oct 22 | 1893 |
|
|||||
| 8 | 27 | Cicere Albert | M | Son | S | Apr 21 | 1899 |
|
|||||
9 |
28 | Huehn Christian | M | Head | M | May 16 | 1832 |
|
|||||
10 |
28 | Huehn Madglane | F | Wife | M | Nov 26 | 1829 |
|
|||||
| 11 | 28 | Huehn William | M | Son | M | Aug 10 | 1862 |
|
Links | ||||
12 |
28 | Huehn Mary | F | Wife | M | Sep 28 | 1870 |
|
|||||
13 |
28 | Huehn Gerity C.A. | F | Daughter | S | Oct 30 | 1894 |
|
|||||
| 14 | 28 | Huehn Albert | M | Lodger | D | Jul 22 | 1867 |
|
|||||
15 |
29 | Roose Jacob? | M | Head | M | May 4 | 1833 |
|
|||||
16 |
29 | Roose Elizabeth | F | Wife | M | May 19 | 1844 |
|
Links | ||||
| 17 | 29 | Roose Mary | F | Daughter | S | Feb 2 | 1876 |
|
|||||
| 18 | 29 | Roose Annie | F | Daughter | S | Dec 25 | 1879 |
|
|||||
| 19 | 29 | Roose Charles | M | Son | S | Aug 21 | 1881 |
|
Links | ||||
| 20 | 29 | Roose Albertina | F | Daughter | S | Jun 29 | 1883 |
|
|||||
| 21 | 29 | Roose Nelda | F | Daughter | S | Dec 17 | 1885 |
|
|||||
22 |
29 | Deigel Edna | F | adopted | S | Feb 20 | 1891 |
|
|||||
| 23 | 30 | Wankel Enyl | M | Head | M | Sep 18 | 1864 |
|
Links | ||||
24 |
30 | Wankel Mary | F | Wife | M | Feb 13 | 1878 |
|
|||||
| 25 | 30 | Wankel Irene | F | Daughter | S | Sep 2 | 1887 |
|
|||||
| 26 | 30 | Wankel Harold | M | Son | S | Aug 31 | 1891 |
|
|||||
| 27 | 31 | Reinhart Frank | M | Head | M | Mar 3 | 1855 |
|
|||||
| 28 | 31 | Reinhart Louiza | F | Wife | M | Mar 27 | 1860 |
|
|||||
| 29 | 31 | Reinhart John | M | Son | S | Mar 2 | 1883 |
|
|||||
| 30 | 31 | Reinhart Joseph | M | Son | S | May 2 | 1885 |
|
|||||
| 31 | 31 | Reinhart Alvin | M | Son | S | Feb 14 | 1891 |
|
|||||
| 32 | 31 | Reinhart Lillie | F | Daughter | S | Mar 26 | 1894 |
|
|||||
| 33 | 31 | Reinhart Minnie | F | Daughter | S | Mar 1 | 1898 |
|
|||||
| 34 | 32 | Sherman Thos A. | M | Head | M | May 5 | 1861 |
|
Links | ||||
35 |
32 | Sherman Christina | F | Wife | M | Jan 17 | 1860 |
|
|||||
| 36 | 32 | Sherman Minnie B. | F | Daughter | S | Feb 3 | 1889 |
|
|||||
37 |
32 | Sherman Camelia S. | F | Daughter | S | Jan 11 | 1895 |
|
|||||
| 38 | 32 | Sherman Lillian S. | F | Daughter | S | Aug 11 | 1900 |
|
|||||
| 39 | 33 | Froehlich Wm | M | Head | M | Oct 21 | 1863 |
|
Links | ||||
| 40 | 33 | Froehlich Lorrie V. | F | Wife | M | Jan 18 | 1874 |
|
|||||
| 41 | 33 | Froehlich Elizabeth | F | Daughter | S | Feb 2 | 1895 |
|
|||||
| 42 | 33 | Froehlich William | M | Son | S | Aug 20 | 1896 |
|
|||||
| 43 | 34 | Batte Lorance | M | Head | M | Jul 9 | 1876 |
|
|||||
| 44 | 34 | Batte Annie | F | Wife | M | Jul 25 | 1876 |
|
|||||
45 |
34 | Batte Louis | M | Son | S | Aug 8 | 1899 |
|
|||||
| 46 | 35 | Schnider Geo | M | Head | M | Feb 18 | 1847 |
|
|||||
| 47 | 35 | Schnider Elizabeth | F | Wife | M | Jul 17 | 1855 |
|
|||||
48 |
35 | Schnider Almeda | F | Daughter | S | Feb 27 | 1883 |
|
|||||
| 49 |
|
||||||||||||
| 50 |
|
||||||||||||
The following note applies to line 4:
| 'A discrepancy betweeen sex and relationship to head. Relationship should be daughter.' |
The following note applies to line 12:
| 'Relationship to head is likely daughter-in-law.' |
The following note applies to line 13:
| 'Relationship to head is likely grand-daughter.' |
The following note applies to line 24:
| 'A discrepancy exists between birth year and age. Birth year likely 1868.' |
Field correction notes are suggested changes offered by a proofreader or user, they should not be considered authoritative. If the transcriber agrees with the suggestion they will change the line. Notes for changes that have been made are removed periodically. The presence of an uncorrected note is an extra prompt to the user to consult the image. It is always good practice to confirm the accuracy of the transcription by consulting the image.
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 1 | 27 | Cicere | Hergal | M | Head | M | Oct 18 | 1844 | 56 | ||
On line 1,
the value for the surname
field is "Cicere",
the suggested correction is "Ciceri". Submitted by Shelley. The following comment was attached: clearly an 'i' at the end-1911 also shows Ciceri | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 2 | 27 | Cicere | Minnie | F | Wife | M | Mar 25 | 1855 | 46 | ||
On line 2,
the value for the day
field is "25",
the suggested correction is "29". Submitted by Shelley. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 3 | 27 | Cicere | Elego? | M | Son | S | Dec 1 | 1881 | 19 | ||
On line 3,
the value for the givens
field is "Elego?",
the suggested correction is "Elego". Submitted by Shelley. The following comment was attached: I also see Elego-1911 shows Eligio | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 7 | 27 | Cicere | Floss | F | Daughter | S | Oct 22 | 1893 | 7 | ||
On line 7,
the value for the givens
field is "Floss",
the suggested correction is "Flass". Submitted by Shelley. The following comment was attached: possibly could be Floss, but the 3rd letter definitely looks like an 'a' | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 9 | 28 | Huehn | Christian | M | Head | M | May 16 | 1832 | 68 | ||
On line 9,
the value for the surname
field is "Huehn",
the suggested correction is "Huehs". Submitted by Shelley. The following comment was attached: definitely not an 'n' at the end-1911 also shows Huehs for William and family | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 10 | 28 | Huehn | Madglane | F | Wife | M | Nov 26 | 1829 | 71 | ||
On line 10,
the value for the givens
field is "Madglane",
the suggested correction is "Madglana". Submitted by Shelley. The following comment was attached: magnification clearly shows an 'a' at the end | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 15 | 29 | Roose | Jacob? | M | Head | M | May 4 | 1833 | 67 | ||
On line 15,
the value for the givens
field is "Jacob?",
the suggested correction is "Jacob". Submitted by Shelley. The following comment was attached: I also see Jacob | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 16 | 29 | Roose | Elizabeth | F | Wife | M | May 19 | 1844 | 56 | ||
On line 16,
the value for the day
field is "19",
the suggested correction is "18". Submitted by Shelley. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 22 | 29 | Deigel | Edna | F | adopted | S | Feb 20 | 1891 | 10 | ||
On line 22,
the value for the surname
field is "Deigel",
the suggested correction is "Deagel". Submitted by Shelley. The following comment was attached: magnification shows the 3rd letter to be an 'a' | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 35 | 32 | Sherman | Christina | F | Wife | M | Jan 17 | 1860 | 41 | ||
On line 35,
the value for the givens
field is "Christina",
the suggested correction is "Christiana". Submitted by Shelley. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 37 | 32 | Sherman | Camelia S. | F | Daughter | S | Jan 11 | 1895 | 6 | ||
On line 37,
the value for the givens
field is "Camelia S.",
the suggested correction is "Cornelia S.". Submitted by Shelley. The following comment was attached: 1911 also shows Cornelia | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 45 | 34 | Batte | Louis | M | Son | S | Aug 8 | 1899 | 2 | ||
On line 45,
the value for the year
field is "1899",
the suggested correction is "1898". Submitted by Shelley. | |||||||||||
| Field Value Correction Note | |||||||||||
| 48 | 35 | Schnider | Almeda | F | Daughter | S | Feb 27 | 1883 | 17 | ||
On line 48,
the value for the age
field is "17",
the suggested correction is "18". Submitted by Shelley. | |||||||||||
To register as a person researching someone on this page click here.
Go to: Subdistrict Number: d-7 District: WATERLOO (North/Nord) National: Canada.
Quick search for possible matches to 1911 Census
All data on this site is copyrighted, use for personal research is free.
Redistribution requires permission: email census@automatedgenealogy.com